The floods came like a thief in the night, just as the Red Death did in Edgar Allan Poe’s story. They hit hard, as if their aim was to establish an “illimitable dominion over all.” The flooded territory in the former Yugoslavia is currently larger than the state of Israel, Kuwait or EU member state Slovenia. The part of Bosnia underwater is the size of Montenegro. There, 1 million people are affected by the floods.
The water has claimed its reign over Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia and smaller parts of Croatia. The map of flooded territory brings back bad memories: It is reminiscent of the war maps of the three major actors in the Yugoslav conflict of the 1990s.
Trouble never comes alone, says a Bosnian proverb. What escaped from the flames of war is now taken away by water. TV footage from Bosnia shows a man sitting in a small boat silently watching his new house — built on the foundations of one burned down in the war — collapsing and sinking.
There are dozens of dead and counting. The apocalyptic landscapes are like scenes that did not make the final cut of Darren Aronofsky’s Noah.
However, if there is something that brings hope, it is the rediscovered solidarity of the people of the former Yugoslavia.
The government of Montenegro, for instance, on Friday last week offered “all possible help” for flood-hit areas. This included cheap electricity for Serbia and the assistance of the Montenegrin army and police rescue, diving and medical teams and hundreds of volunteers. Thousands of citizens of Montenegro have donated money and essential supplies. Lots of Montenegrin companies, even banks, have sent money to Serbia and Bosnia.
Two decades ago, “volunteers” from Montenegro were coming to Bosnia to bomb Sarajevo and Montenegrin armed forces fought Bosnians in Mostar and surrounding areas.
Macedonia has sent help too, and even the minister of the security force of Kosovo, Agim Ceku, declared that “ignoring the relations between the two countries and the fact that these countries [Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia] have not recognized us, we’re ready to intervene when it comes to human lives.”
On the other hand, the Serbian Orthodox Church took care that the necessary dose of Balkan madness in the otherwise too-good-to-be-true story was provided. The head of the church in Montenegro, Metropolitan Amfilohije, felt that the occasion of a great natural disaster was the perfect moment to attack the LGBT population. He said that by sending the floods on them, God was punishing his people for Conchita Wurst, Eurovision and upcoming gay pride marches in Belgrade and Podgorica.
In former president Josip Tito’s Yugoslavia, a high level of solidarity was a political priority, according to its ideology based on the Louis Blanc slogan, adopted by Karl Marx: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” Montenegro was hit by a devastating earthquake in 1979. During the next decade it received US$4 billion to US$5 billion in aid from other former Yugoslav republics.
Yugoslav solidarity worked just fine for 45 years. Then the fairytale slid into another genre and ended with solidarity being eaten alive by the beast of nationalism. Wars have cleared the path for our crony capitalism with its ideology of social Darwinism: Those in need were treated like social parasites and a barrier on the path of “dynamic development” of Balkan states.
Now catastrophe in the former Yugoslavia is in the headlines once again. However, this time, we are not killing each other.
We are helping each other instead.
The people of the former Yugoslavia have not had much to cheer about in the past quarter of a century. The fact that through the bloodshed of civil wars and the rise of “wild east” capitalism they somehow preserved a sense of solidarity is one of those small triumphs that provides you with the strength to keep swimming when you are about to sink.
Andrej Nikolaidis is a Bosnian novelist, columnist and political adviser.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under