The US recently tried to help the embattled President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) over a media allegation that he is subject to pay US taxes as a resident alien.
Joseph Donovan, managing director of the American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) Washington office, suggested that Ma had renounced his “green card” status in reply to Taiwanese Representative to the US Shen Lyu-shun’s (沈呂巡) letter, a day after the allegation surfaced on Wednesday.
“We have previously been informed that President Ma Ying-jeou’s abandonment of his former legal permanent resident status has long been included in appropriate US immigration system records. This issue is therefore closed,” the letter said.
This political interference by the US was reminiscent of the incident during the 2012 presidential election in which a “senior US official” reportedly called the Financial Times to say that then-Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had left Washington with “distinct doubts” whether she is willing or able to continue stable cross-strait relations, which dealt a blow to Tsai’s election campaign.
The US government on Thursday once again showed its unabashed preference to see the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in power as it did ahead of the 2012 presidential election when, along with a leak to the Financial Times, it implemented a set of measures trying to tip the result in the KMT’s favor, despite professing US neutrality in Taiwan’s democratic elections.
The way the US sent out the message in the two cases may appear to be unimpeachable and yet it is reprehensible because they are examples of the distribution of subjective content in favor of a given cause — to influence Taiwanese and further the US agenda — rather than the provision of evidence-based, factual information that could help the formulation of informed opinion, which is crucial to democratic development.
Donovan’s reply to Shen’s letter was only three paragraphs long. In addition to saying that they were informed of Ma relinquishing his status, he briefly mentioned the allegation made by the Chinese-language Next Magazine and explained that the US does not expand classes of taxpayers required to pay taxes on worldwide incomes under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. Nowhere is there any evidence in the letter that people can examine and make their own judgements.
Concerns have already been voiced that the US must remain neutral during the next presidential election in Taiwan, although the vote is still two years away.
For example, Randall Schriver, head of the Project 2049 Institute, has repeatedly called on the US not to repeat its “mistake” before the previous presidential election when it looked as though it had chosen sides. He argues that the US should support processes that help Taiwan deepen its resiliency, and that the US should have the confidence that the next leader of Taiwan will be capable of managing cross-strait relations no matter which party governs the country after the 2016 election.
Despite the speedy clarification from the AIT office in Taipei that it was the Ma administration’s decision to make the Donovan letter public, not the US’, the US getting involved in Ma’s green card issue in this way reneged on the US’ position that it does not comment on individuals’ visa or immigration status.
In light of the cases in Taiwan and the established records of US interference in democratic elections in many other countries, people have good reason to question the US’ official policy of neutrality in the 2016 presidential election.
There will be a question of whether any deal is made behind the US' endorsement for the green card issue, which Ma has patently been lying about.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and