Salah Darghouth’s frustration is visible.
“You see that guy working on the ninth floor?” says the adviser to Tunisia’s sustainable development ministry, pointing at a laborer on the half-built tower block opposite. “He harasses me. Every day, I watch him and all the others throw their refuse onto the street below — concrete, litter, everything.”
Across Tunisia, with the dust of revolution beginning to settle, refuse looms large in the public conversation. Litter, especially plastic bags, has come to dominate the country’s famously dramatic landscape. The problem is felt by all citizens, but none experience it more acutely than those living next to the straining landfill sites.
Ridha Trabelsi, 45, a shopkeeper who lives in the small Tunis suburb of el-Attar, is a case in point.
“Would you like to live here?” he asks, gesturing toward nearby Jbel Borj Chakir, Tunisia’s largest landfill and a source of growing exasperation. “They said they were going to close it last year, but they haven’t. It’s still here and it’s only getting bigger.”
The impact of landfills on such areas is difficult to overstate. In 2011, after what Tunisians and media called the Jasmine Revolution, it was the landfill sites at Djerba, Enkhila (near Nabeul), Oued Laya (near Sousse), Agareb (near Sfax), and the country’s only hazardous waste-treatment plant, at Jradou, that bore the brunt of residents’ fury.
All were closed, most of them temporarily, as a result of violence. Jradou remains shut and it is unclear where its waste is being treated. Plans to reopen the Djerba site have triggered more violence.
In el-Attar, the stench of garbage chokes the air; it sticks in your throat and permeates your clothing. Trabelsi’s son, eight-year-old Mohamed, is asthmatic. Respiratory illness is rife.
“When you build a landfill, you build it for a specific period,” says Morched Garbouj, an environmental engineer and president of the SOS BIAA environmental group. “Here at Jbel Borj Chakir, that period ended in 2013. At that point, it should either have been closed or, at the least, operating at around 10 percent to 20 percent capacity.”
Darghouth said no decision has been taken on the long-term future of Jbel Borj Chakir.
“We’re taking delivery of about 2,000 tonnes of waste every day. That has to go somewhere. We’re just dealing with everything on a day-to-day basis while we work to implement a larger strategy,” he says.
“One of the problems here is that we don’t know what kind of waste we’re dealing with,” Garbouj says. “Elsewhere, waste is separated; here it all gets dumped together: chemical, industrial, household and medical.”
Residents and those who make their living scavenging the dump have reported finding blood bags and fetuses in the garbage at Jbel Borj Chakir, a claim denied by Agence Nationale de Gestion des Dechets, which manages waste on behalf of the environment ministry.
“I didn’t just see them [the different types of waste], I handled them,” former refuse worker Kamel Marouani says. “Chemical, medical, everything.”
“One of the problems with all the different types of waste is the leachate it produces [the liquid produced at the base by the compressed garbage],” Garbouj says. “Leachate is highly toxic, so there are strict controls about how it should be treated and disposed of. However, because no one knows what’s in it, no one knows how it should be treated.”
Marouani, who was diagnosed with lung cancer in August 2012, worked at Jbel Borj Chakir for 10 years — the past five for a French firm, Pizzorno, one of three contractors that manage landfills for the Tunisian government. One of his tasks was to work in the 10 leachate basins that surround Jbel Borj Chakir. He was required to wade through the often chest-high, reeking, black leachate — building dams or clearing away the thick foam that forms on the surface of the basin.
SOS BIAA, an environmental advocacy group, estimates that the cost of transporting and disposing of waste at Jbel Borj Chakir was about US$110 to US$125 a tonne, compared with the equivalent cost in New York of US$86. This was despite significantly lower overheads. Trucks dumping at Jbel Borj Chakir pay Pizzorno US$15 for every tonne of waste deposited in return for the firm’s expertise in managing the site. Given that, on an average day, about 3,000 tonnes of waste is deposited, that equates to a daily revenue stream of US$45,000. The costs of trucks and labor are billed to the Tunisian government.
In 2011, Pizzorno was the subject of a complaint by the post-Arab Spring government’s Commission of Investigation on Corruption and Embezzlement over its dealings with former Tunisian president Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali’s regime. Pizzorno’s five-year contract with the Tunisian government expired on Thursday. No decision has been taken on a possible successor. Pizzorno, which continues to manage the site on a caretaker basis, declined to comment on any of the points raised in this article.
Desta Mebratu, deputy director of the UN Environment Program’s regional office for Africa, said: “Disposal in sanitary landfills is the last option that should be considered. Tunisia is one of the first African countries that established a national program on waste minimization and cleaner production. This program has led to reduction of a generation of industrial waste and reduction of pollution.”
In el-Attar, little of this matters. Children continue to play near the landfill. According to SOS BIAA tests, the local water supply — like all the water within a 5km radius — continues to be contaminated by fine particles, nitrates and even heavy metals from the dump. Trabelsi looks at the mountain of garbage that dominates the landscape for kilometers.
“We have sick old people. Our children are sick. We can’t continue,” Trabelsi said.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As a person raised in a family that revered the teachings of Confucius (孔子) and Mencius (孟子), I believe that both sages would agree with Hong Kong students that people-based politics is the only legitimate way to govern China, including Hong Kong. More than two millennia ago, Confucius insisted that a leader’s first loyalty is to his people — they are water to the leader’s ship. Confucius said that the water could let the ship float only if it sailed in accordance with the will of the water. If the ship sailed against the will of the water, the ship would sink. Two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
The US Navy’s aircraft carrier battle groups are the most dramatic symbol of Washington’s military and geopolitical power. They were critical to winning World War II in the Pacific and have since been deployed in the Indo-Pacific region to communicate resolve against potential adversaries of the US. The presence or absence of the US Seventh Fleet — the configuration of US Navy ships and aircraft in the Indo-Pacific region built around the carriers — generally determines whether war or peace prevails in the region. In the immediate post-war period, Washington’s strategic planners in the administration of then-US president Harry Truman shockingly