When searching for an adjective to describe our comprehensively surveilled networked world — the one bookmarked by the US National Security Agency (NSA) at one end and by Google, Facebook, Yahoo and co at the other — “Orwellian” is the word that people generally reach for.
However, “Kafkaesque” seems more appropriate. The term is conventionally defined as “having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre or illogical quality,” but Frederick Karl, Franz Kafka’s most assiduous biographer, regarded that as missing the point.
“What’s Kafkaesque,” he told the New York Times, “is when you enter a surreal world in which all your control patterns, all your plans, the whole way in which you have configured your own behavior, begins to fall to pieces, when you find yourself against a force that does not lend itself to the way you perceive the world.”
A vivid description of this was provided recently by Janet Vertesi, a sociologist at Princeton University.
She gave a talk at a conference describing her experience of trying to keep her pregnancy secret from marketers.
Her report is particularly pertinent because pregnant women are regarded by online advertisers as one of the most valuable entities on the net.
You and I are worth, on average, only US$0.10 each. However, a pregnant woman is valued at US$1.50 because she is about to embark on a series of purchasing decisions stretching well into her child’s lifetime.
Professor Vertesi’s story is about big data, but from the bottom up. It is a gripping personal account of what it takes to avoid being collected, tracked and entered into databases.
First — and most obviously — she determined that there would be absolutely no mention of her new state on social media.
She phoned or wrote individually to friends and family members to give them the good news and asked them not to mention it on Facebook.
However, an uncle in Australia sent her a congratulatory message via Facebook.
“I then did what any rational person would do. I deleted the thread of all our conversations and unfriended him,” she said.
He replied plaintively: “But I didn’t put it on your wall,” apparently unaware that chats and other messages are not private in the sense that he assumed.
In preparing for the birth of her child, Vertesi was nothing if not thorough.
Instead of using a Web browser in the normal way — ie, leaving a trail of cookies and other digital tracks, she used the online service Tor to visit babycenter.com anonymously. She shopped offline whenever she could and paid in cash.
On the occasions when she had to use Amazon, she set up a new Amazon account linked to an e-mail address on a personal server, had all packages delivered to a local locker and made sure only to pay with Amazon gift cards that had been purchased with cash.
The really significant moment came when she came to buy a big-ticket item — an expensive stroller that was the urbanite’s equivalent of an SUV.
Her husband tried to buy US$500 of Amazon gift vouchers with cash, only to discover that this triggered a warning: Retailers have to report people buying large numbers of gift vouchers with cash because, well, you know, they are obviously money launderers.
At this point, some sobering thoughts begin to surface.
The first is Melvin Kranzberg’s observation that “technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.”
Our technologies have values built into them, which is why Vertesi in her talk cites someone’s observation that “the iPod is a tool to make us moral” (because it encourages people to buy music rather than download it illicitly) and philosophers argue about whether surveillance encourages moral — ie, socially approved — behavior (think speed cameras).
Even more sobering, though, are the implications of Vertesi’s decision to use Tor as a way of ensuring the anonymity of her Web-browsing activities.
She had a perfectly reasonable reason for doing this — to ensure that, as a mother-to-be, she was not tracked and targeted by online marketers.
However, we know from the Edward Snowden disclosures and other sources that Tor users are automatically regarded with suspicion by the NSA et al on the grounds that people who do not wish to leave a digital trail are obviously up to no good. The same goes for people who encrypt their e-mails.
This is why the industry response to protests about tracking is so inadequate. The market will fix the problem, the companies say, because if people do not like being tracked then they can opt not to be. However, the Vertesi experiment shows that if you take measures to avoid being tracked, then you increase the probability that you will be. Which is truly Kafkaesque.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs