Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟), convener of the Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee, led a team inspecting the Academia Sinica on Monday. Lu said that as the institution falls under the jurisdication of the Presidential Office, academics are technically civil servants and should therefore be politically neutral and should furthermore observe administrative ethics.
He said that if the institution is found to have performed poorly, the government should consider abolishing it.
Academia Sinica and the public were up in arms. Lu later said his words had been taken out of context, seeking to clarify his position by saying he had not referred to scrapping the Academia Sinica itself; that it was just that he felt that the Institutum Iurisprudentiae and the Institute of Political Science had become considerably politically partisan not long after they were established. He added that, according to the Office of the President Organization Act (總統府組織法), unwanted departments could be abolished.
It is true that Article 17 of the President Organization Act states that the Academia Sinica “shall be under the direct administrative supervision of the Office of the President” and is part of the administrative system. It is also true that its researchers are considered civil servants and therefore subject to the stipulations in Article 7 of the Civil Service Administrative Neutrality Act (公務人員行政中立法), which prohibits their membership in any political party and engaging in other political activity. Also, researchers are bound by Article 2 of the Civil Service Act (公務員服務法).
However, the Academia Sinica is a research institution. Researchers have a constitutional right to academic freedom. There should not exist a relationship of top-down state authority. The Academia Sinica should not be regarded as an organ of the state following directives from the government, nor should its resources and academic research be subject to state control. This is a serious infringement of academic freedom.
The entire inspection process was questionable to the utmost degree and reveals the desire of certain politicians to control academic institutions and their staff. Legislators are elected representatives of the public, but Lu prioritizing the president’s interests in this manner amply demonstrates that the party-state is alive and well and that the Constitution is foundering. Threatening to abolish the Academia Sinica or any of its institutes is pernicious behavior and will likely have a chilling effect in academia.
Chinese society traditionally has the utmost respect for its educated elite and in Confucian thought intellectuals have a social responsibility to ensure the state is stable, ordered and robust. Through their studies, academics help steer society on the correct course, not only from their position in the government — many in the Cabinet hold doctorates — but also from within the opposition, providing critiques and recommendations for government policy.
It would be naive to think Lu’s inspection was unrelated to the role Academia Sinica associate researcher Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) played in the Sunflower protest movement. However, threatening to abolish the nation’s highest research institution, or targeting specific institutes within it, just to get at one man is to make an enemy of academia.
Even former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had absolute power, knew not to make enemies of the intelligentsia. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) no longer seems to care about his rock-bottom popularity, and seems content to go down in history as the president who suppressed academic freedom in this country. Once again, he is showing himself to be capable of impossibly stupid behavior.
If Ma still cares about his legacy, he should come out in defense of academic freedom and freedom of expression, and condemn Lu’s actions.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry