On the afternoon of April 26, the 28th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, I attended a screening of the documentary A2-B-C, at the invitation of the Taipei Bar Association, an invitation which included sitting on the panel for the ensuing discussion. The film, by Ian Ash, a US independent documentary filmmaker who has lived in Japan for 10 years, is a balanced account of the health impact on children exposed to radiation following the March 11, 2011, Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster.
The film reveals that an increasing number of children are being diagnosed with thyroid cysts and explores subtle changes in their biological and mental health, implicitly challenging the Japanese government’s insistence that radiation remains at safe levels.
This brought back memories of a visit I made, along with some professors, to a community that had been exposed to radiation contamination 20 years ago when I was still at university. I remember doctors examining children there for thyroid cysts, while worried mothers questioned the doctors on the possible health effects to their children and what they could do about it.
The most direct damage of a nuclear disaster is the impact on health due to exposure from radiation. According to a recent official Japanese government report, only a very limited number of individuals were affected by the radiation from the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant. In fact, of the cancers known to be linked to exposure to radiation, leukemia has the shortest incubation period — it can develop in only two years — while the majority of the other types, including thyroid cancer, need anywhere between five and 10 years, or more, to manifest.
Research on the effects of the Chernobyl disaster has shown that the incidents of thyroid cancer in children and adults under 18 years old when initially exposed to radiation from the disaster was 10 to 12 times higher 10 years after the event, than it was five years after.
These results show the importance of long-term monitoring of the health of people exposed to radiation. Notably, however, with this nuclear disaster, the committee of the prefectural government’s Fukushima Health Survey announced on Feb 7, almost three years after the original disaster, that a total of 33 children had already been clinically confirmed to have developed thyroid cancer, an increase of seven from the 26 confirmed cases known in November last year.
These results correspond to the prevalence of thyroid cancer from official reports from the Chernobyl disaster approximately three years after that event.
Today, only two or three years after the Japanese disaster, it is impossible to discount the relationship between the cases of thyroid cancer in children and radiation exposure: Whether the onset of cancer is related to radiation and the relationship between the cancer and the dosage received, whether age is a factor in the incubation period for children, or to what degree this period differs from that in adults, requires more scientific research.
Further, according to a WHO report on the disaster published last year, entitled Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, in the worst affected areas — including Namie-machi town and Iitate-mura village — the preliminary estimated radiation effective doses for the first year ranged from 12 to 25 millisievert (mSv), and the lifetime risk of developing thyroid cancer, breast cancer and all solid cancers is predicted to increase by up to about 70 percent, 6 percent and 4 percent respectively, over baseline rates in females exposed as infants and, for leukemia, by up to about 7 percent over baseline rates in males exposed as infants.
The report goes on to say that if the area had been evacuated at the time of the disaster, many people could have avoided being unnecessarily exposed to radiation, thereby reducing the risk of later developing many types of cancer and other ill health effects.
In other words, three years after the disaster, the risk of children developing thyroid cancer is on the rise and effective emergency response personnel evacuation and safeguards would have reduced the harm caused by radiation exposure in the immediate aftermath of the accident.
In Taiwan, our nuclear disaster response mechanism, together with response measures for the emergency evacuation of personnel within a nuclear plant’s emergency evacuation radius, medical treatment for radiation exposure and measures concerning the environment and food safety, are all much less developed compared to those in Japan.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated country, with three aging nuclear power stations in operation on an island barely 400km long, together with a fourth, uncompleted plant that has been slowly cobbled together over the past two decades. It is no wonder that concerns over nuclear safety have climaxed in Taiwan and show no signs of abating following Fukushima.
The public and the authorities need to consider that should there be a nuclear disaster with a reactor core meltdown, the area within a 30km radius of the nuclear plant in question will need to be evacuated. For northern Taiwan, this would mean that as many as 5 or 6 million people will have nowhere to escape to.
In addition, it would be difficult to guarantee that the land will not have been contaminated and this will severely affect our trade and exports which will be treated as pariahs in the global economy. Is this something we are prepared to risk, for our own sakes and those of our children?
Ho Jung-chun has a doctorate from the School of Public Health at the Taipei Medical University and is a board member of the National Association for Radiation Protection.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under