It would be an understatement to say that our world is undergoing rapid and far-reaching change. The global economy, the geopolitical landscape, the environment and technology are subject to constantly shifting conditions that reinforce and transform one another in a web of complex interactions. In such an unpredictable and interconnected setting, effective leadership must be based on a radical outlook, a multifaceted skillset and an understanding of technology and talent.
The trends that are shaping the 21st-century world embody both promise and peril. Globalization, for example, has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, while contributing to social fragmentation and a massive increase in inequality, not to mention serious environmental damage. Likewise, big data offer untold benefits to companies and consumers, but pose a real threat to privacy and personal freedom.
A similar dichotomy applies to many other critical issues, including adaptation to climate change, efforts to improve resource management, urbanization and the rise of megacities, increased labor mobility and human-capital expansion.
The scale and complexity of the challenges that lie ahead are undoubtedly daunting. However, rapid, far-reaching change can also present great opportunities. To make the most of them, the world needs technologically literate leaders — call them “techno-politicians” — who have an intuitive understanding of how to shape progress in this new, unpredictable environment.
Within the framework of techno-politics, economic growth and technological innovation are the two most important factors shaping the global landscape. How we adapt to and guide their trajectories will determine our collective future.
In economic terms, the world is entering an era of diminished expectations. If, as predicted, average annual GDP growth amounts to 3 percent in the foreseeable future, it will take 25 years for the world economy to double in size — 10 years longer than it took before the global economic crisis, when average GDP growth stood at 5 percent. Learning to live with slower growth will not be easy.
Given that debt-fueled consumption has run its course, productivity gains will become an increasingly critical driver of economic growth. However, at a time when rising inequality is undermining social cohesion, it is far from certain that the conditions required to support such gains — that is, improved education and stronger incentives to innovate — can be met.
Perhaps most important, even as economic growth slows, technological change continues at a breakneck pace, raising seemingly unanswerable questions about its potential impact on the global economy.
While some warn that technological progress will leave many unemployed, others remain convinced that displaced workers will find new jobs that do not yet exist, as has occurred in the past. All that is certain is that technology and innovation are disrupting virtually every aspect of life.
How can we adapt to such a world? What underpins success in this new and challenging environment?
In a techno-polity, two inextricably linked factors are crucial: talent and innovation. Talent is now the key factor driving competitiveness (or the lack thereof) for companies and countries alike. Indeed, “talentism” will be the prevailing economic credo, with human or intellectual capital becoming the most critical asset — and the one most difficult to acquire and retain.
Innovation, spurred by talent, will determine success. In the future, the distinction between high and low-income countries, or between emerging and mature markets, will no longer matter. The question will be whether or not an economy can innovate.
A techno-polity also recognizes the critical role of co-operation, strategic thinking and adaptation. The biggest challenges nowadays are global in nature, and thus can be addressed only by engaging decisionmakers and interest groups from various spheres. New partnerships must be forged, even among actors with seemingly disparate interests. Those who struggle to cope with change must be supported, not scorned.
However, effective techno-politicians must go beyond firefighting to think about the long term. They must be able to respond to new and impending developments without delay, constantly experimenting with new ideas and processes. Moreover, they must to be able to understand and react simultaneously to multiple competing realities.
The role of the techno-polity is to steer the world toward positive outcomes. It will demand that decisionmakers use their heads and hearts — and it will also test their nerves.
Klaus Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with