The government has been saying that industrial upgrades and innovation are key to reviving the dire state of the nation’s manufacturing sector and the economy as a whole, as manufacturers face increasing competition from China and South Korea.
However, more than empty slogans will be needed to make a successful industrial transformation. To compete with foreign firms, Taiwan first needs to increase its own capabilities, rather than relying on bilateral trade agreements.
The easiest, most effective way to help local industry to offer higher-value products and services is for the government to listen to what corporate executives advise. However, apparently government officials do not take local corporate executives’ words seriously.
“Not a single government official has approached me to discuss how to build an electric vehicle supply chain in Taiwan,” Simplo Technology Co chairman and chief executive officer Raymond Sung (宋福祥) said last week.
Three years ago, Sung suggested that the government concentrate state resources on developing a supply chain for electric vehicle production, given that the electric car industry looks set to be the next big industry and that it could provide a chance for the manufacturing sector to reclaim its glory.
This was not the first time Sung has complained of the government’s bureaucratic inertia.
Sung said he feared that the nation could quickly lose its edge if the government remains inactive.
To facilitate development in a small market like Taiwan, Sung advised the government to create a single platform for automakers, component manufacturers, research houses and colleges to jointly produce energy-efficient cars.
Simplo, which supplies battery packs to Apple Inc, has started supplying batteries to electric bike and bus manufacturers in China, Europe and Japan. The company hopes the business will ignite growth.
Sung has said that the nation is good at manufacturing and all it needs is to form a task force to bring together national and industrial resources and to avoid wasted investment through multiple parties developing the same technologies.
Many local colleges and universities poured resources into developing electric cars, but the vehicles they showcased were all very similar.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, which assembles iPhones and iPads for Apple Inc, has also showed strong interest in investing in the electric car business.
Taiwan has already built an electric vehicle supply chain, but it is not strong enough to fend off global competition, as most of the producers are small and medium-sized businesses.
Taiwanese companies supply key components to US electric car maker Tesla Motors Inc. The firms face losing orders from Tesla once Tesla moves a local factory back to the US and builds a new one in China. Chroma ATE Inc, which provides precision test and measuring instrumentation, automated test systems and automation solutions and was one of Tesla’s major local partners, lost orders for its services for Tesla’s new car, the Model S.
It is clear that the risk of losing competitiveness is imminent. Totally ignoring the time constraint, the Cabinet said it has tapped 20 economic experts and industry representatives to attend a series of national economic conferences next month at the earliest. The meetings aim to map out strategies for dealing with cross-strait trade ties with China and the growing trend of inking bilateral trade pacts.
However, the meetings are time-consuming and could be fruitless because local firms face more complex issues, which increased trade deals cannot solve.
The government is working on efforts not relevant to industry needs. What the industry does need is an environment favorable to industrial development.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with