As China boosts its military spending, rattling neighbors over territorial disputes at sea, an investigation shows that European countries have approved billions in transfers of weapons and military-ready technology to the Asian giant.
China’s air force relies on French-designed helicopters, while submarines and frigates involved in Beijing’s physical assertion of its claim to vast swathes of the South China Sea are powered by German and French engines — part of a separate trade in “dual use” technology to Beijing’s armed forces.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) announced stepped-up production of the Airbus EC175 helicopter in China during his visit to France this month — a deal analysts said could result in technology transfers to the military.
“European exports are very important for the Chinese military,” said Andrei Chang, editor of the Hong Kong-based Kanwa Asian Defense Review. “Without European technology, the Chinese navy would not be able to move.”
The EU imposed an arms embargo on China after its army killed many demonstrators in the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre, but member states are free to interpret the embargo loosely, analysts said.
The exports have generated friction with the US — which does not export arms to Beijing — along with criticism from activists pointing to human rights violations and analysts citing regional security concerns.
An EU spokesman said in a statement that “the final decision to authorize or deny the [arms] export is the responsibility of EU member states.”
China — the world’s second-largest military spender — last month announced the latest of many double-digit rises in its official defense budget.
EU arms makers received licenses to export equipment worth 3 billion euros (US$4.1 billion) to China in the decade to 2012, according to annual EU reports on the trade. The most recent said arms exports worth 173 million euros were approved in 2012, with France issuing more than 80 percent of them by value.
A French parliamentary report said the country delivered China arms worth 104 million euros.
Most of the sum was accounted for by the production of Airbus helicopters in China for use by China’s military, according to analysts from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), which monitors arms transfers.
Other EU licenses included almost 3 million euros of “smooth-bore weapons” and accessories, approved for export by Britain and nearly 18 million euros of “vessels of war” or their accessories and components, authorized by the Netherlands. Most of Beijing’s military imports last year came from Russia, while France, Britain and Germany supplied 18 percent, SIPRI estimated.
China is on track to become a major military power.
While it calls its expanding capabilities peaceful and aimed at self-defense, relations with its neighbors have soured in recent years, especially its rival Japan, with experts warning of potentially dangerous escalations if either side miscalculates.
Tensions spiked last year when a Jiangwei-class Chinese frigate was among the vessels Tokyo accused of locking fire-control radar on a destroyer and a helicopter near disputed islands seen as a potential flashpoint, an allegation Beijing denied.
Military experts believe the ship relies on diesel engines produced by German firm MTU.
Another accused ship, a Jiangkai-class vessel, uses engines made by SEMT Pielstick, a French diesel-engine manufacturer owned by German firm MAN Diesel and Turbo, according to analysts and specifications posted on Chinese military Web sites.
MAN said that its Chinese licensees have supplied about 250 engines to China’s navy. MTU said it “acts strictly according to the German export laws,” without elaborating.
The engines are exported as “dual-use” — having civilian and potential military applications — so are exempt from the EU arms embargo. Beijing’s military has acquired an array of such items, including software used to design fighter jets, from Europe over the past decade.
German-designed engines chosen for their quietness power virtually all non-nuclear Chinese submarines and several classes of Chinese frigates deployed in the South China Sea, where Beijing has a host of territorial disputes, analysts said.
Citing the co-production deal signed in France, Chang said: “China uses the name of civil purchase to purchase French helicopter engines and they shift those engines into military helicopters.”
“If [China] knows how to design the middle-sized EC175, they will know how to design a middle-sized military transport helicopter,” he said.
China’s recent military helicopters “appear to just be upgrades” of Airbus designs, said Roger Cliff, military analyst at the US-based Atlantic Council.
Airbus directed inquiries to its helicopter division, which did not respond.
Bernadette Andreosso, director of European studies at Ireland’s University of Limerick, described Europe’s dual-use export controls as “very lax, very loose.”
European countries face a dilemma, analysts said.m
“China represents much more of a threat today to stability in the Pacific and elsewhere,” Andreosso said. “We might have to sacrifice some of our competitiveness to have greater security.”
Arms exports have created tension between the EU and the US, analysts said and according to SIPRI the US has not exported any arms to China in any of the recent years for which it has data.
China’s defense ministry declined to comment.
Campaigners also worry about human rights in China, which jails dissidents and deploys troops in sensitive areas, including Tibet.
“The EU is supposed to be based on the promotion of human rights and democracy, but all too often these values are overridden in the name of short-term profits for arms companies,” Andrew Smith of the British-based Campaign Against Arms Trade said.
Emil Kirchner, an EU policy expert at Britain’s University of Essex, said East Asian tensions meant the exports could eventually damage EU interests.
“Already, cynics claim that if the People’s Liberation Army went to war tomorrow, it would employ an arsenal filled with equipment from Germany, France and Britain,” Kirchner said.
EU companies powering China’s military
AFP, BEIJING
EU countries export a range of technology to China’s military, according to public documents, research institutes and military analysts.
Below is a selection of the weapons and dual-use goods that have flowed from EU countries to China in the past five years.
NAVY
German firm MTU provides engines which power several of China’s latest destroyer classes, military academics said.
Nine of the 11 destroyers China has built since 1991 appear to have German MTU diesel engines paired with gas turbines imported from Ukraine, according to Roger Cliff, military analyst at the US-based Atlantic Council.
China’s latest Yuan submarine class, of which 12 are in service, are either powered by MTU engines or “Chinese-made copies,” Cliff said.
China’s Song class of diesel-powered submarines rely on MTU engines chosen for low noise levels which help evade detection, according to Naval Technology, an online arms database.
Data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) to the end of 2010 shows that 48 MTU-designed diesels for submarines have been supplied to the Chinese navy for use in Song subs.
Two of China’s newest classes of frigate, the Jiangkai I and II, are powered by engines from SEMT Pielstick, a French manufacturer owned by Germany’s MAN Diesel and Turbo, according to analysts and specifications posted on Chinese military Web sites.
British technology is also used by China’s navy. Its latest Houbei class of stealth missile boats come fitted with Rolls-Royce designed water jets produced by subsidiary Kamewa, according to photographs posted on Chinese military Web sites.
AIR FORCE
French firm Airbus delivered 357 helicopters to China between 1992 and last year, including the military-use AS565 Panther helicopter, which is produced under license in China, according to figures compiled by SIPRI.
French firm Aerospatiale, now part of Airbus, delivered 50 Super-Frelon transport helicopters used by China’s military between 2001 and last year, according to SIPRI.
Other items shipped to China between 1998 and last year include 250 turbofans licensed from Britain for use in combat aircraft, SIPRI’s database shows.
LAND FORCES
German firm Deutz exported more than 4,400 engines to China between 1981 and last year, for use in armored personnel carriers, SIPRI figures show.
Deutz engines are used in China’s WZ-523 class of armored vehicles, according to a database maintained by the Federation of American Scientists.
SIPRI’s database shows that in the past five years China has exported the WZ-523 to Ethiopia, Myanmar and Niger, among other countries.
Deutz did not respond to an inquiry. Airbus and Rolls-Royce also failed to respond.
A spokesman for MTU said the company “acts strictly according to the German export laws.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry