When cousins Alexander and Igor Shilov get together each week to drink beer and play Mortal Kombat, they try to avoid discussing politics.
Alexander, 20, has spent almost every day for the past two weeks volunteering at the occupied Donetsk regional administration, where pro-Russia protesters have declared a “Donetsk People’s Republic” and refused to leave the building until a referendum on independence from Kiev is held.
Igor, 28, calls himself a Ukrainian nationalist and supports Svoboda, the parliamentary party that many see as a fascist organization aiming to crack down on Russian speakers in the country’s east.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Over pizza and beer one night recently, the cousins began arguing bitterly as soon as talk turned to politics.
“We can’t deny that the Donetsk People’s Republic is an illegal formation,” Igor said.
“We just want independence,” Alexander said.
“What will independence give us?” Igor asked.
“It’s a good decision for us Donetsk residents, economically and otherwise. The Kiev regime also came to power illegally,” Alexander replied.
In the ensuing hour-long debate, the only kind words the Shilovs shared came when Igor passed Alexander a knife after the younger cousin burned himself on cheese dripping off a pizza slice.
Three-quarters of the inhabitants of Donetsk province, which is part of the Donbass coal-mining region that stretches into Russia, speak Russian as a native language and many have a positive view of their larger neighbor, thanks to longstanding economic and cultural ties.
However, surveys by centers in both Donetsk and Kiev show divided opinions on the region’s future, and rival pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian rallies last month ended in clashes, killing one.
Political differences have grown sharper in the past two weeks as pro-Russia protesters and militia have taken over government buildings in at least 10 cities in eastern Ukraine, splitting friends and relatives.
A poll by the Kiev International Institute of Sociology found 46 percent of those surveyed in eight southern and eastern provinces thought the protests in Kiev that ousted former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych were an “armed coup d’etat organized by the opposition with the help of the West,” while 54 percent thought Russia was “illegally interfering in Ukraine’s internal affairs.”
When asked whether they supported the “actions of those who seize administrative buildings in your region with weapons in hand,” 72 percent of Donetsk residents said no.
In another survey, by the Donetsk Institute for Social Research and Political Analysis, 18.6 percent opposed changes to the government structure, 47 percent wanted federalization or at least more economic independence from Kiev, 27 percent wanted to join Russia in some form and 5 percent wanted national independence.
Many of Alexander and Igor’s disagreements echoed the contrasting narratives peddled by Russian and Ukrainian media, a difference so stark that many here describe it as an information war.
“Separatism is treason, especially under the wing of another government,” Igor said.
“I don’t accept methods like seizing a police station, taking weapons and giving them out to everyone,” he added, referring to takeovers of buildings in places such as Slavyansk, where pro-Russia militia have reportedly seized 400 firearms.
He opposes the uprising in the interests of preserving Ukraine’s territorial integrity and he said the crackdown on the Russian language that protesters railed against was “made up.”
Alexander bristled at the “separatist” label, but admitted he hoped for an independent Donetsk and restored trade ties with Russia. He blamed the pro-Russia atmosphere at rallies — which often feature Russian flags, chants and appeals to Russian President Vladimir Putin — on so-called “protest tourists” from across the border.
After Igor called the militia who had seized buildings “terrorists,” Alexander argued that Right Sector, the ultranationalist group that spearheaded violent clashes with police at the Kiev protests in January, was the real terrorist organization. At the protests, he said, “they didn’t ask the people’s opinion. A referendum is the only way to do that.”
Yekaterina Kovalivnich, 24, whose parents do not approve of her support for the new Kiev government, said many Donetsk residents “categorically can’t accept a different opinion, there is no willingness to go to compromise. In my family, people listen entirely to one side, they can’t listen to any others.”
She and her parents often start arguing about politics when watching Russian television, which she says distorts the situation on the ground. Her parents resent rising food and utility costs under the new regime.
Political views do not follow clear generational lines — Kovalivnich’s grandmother is pro-Ukrainian.
At a pro-Ukraine demonstration last week that also drew pro-Russia protesters, old and young people on both sides continued to argue after the rally was over, but the political differences do appear to have some socioeconomic basis — groups of coalminers and other blue-collar workers have come out to support the Donetsk occupation, arguing that the region’s heavy industry is suffering from the recent disruption to trade with Russia.
“There are people who think that the territorial integrity of Ukraine is paramount, but in miner families no one supports that,” said Artyom, a Donetsk republic activist who declined to give his surname.
Igor said he recently deleted his profile on VK, the country’s most popular social network, and started a new one under a pseudonym because about half of his old friends disagreed with his support for the new Ukrainian government.
“I don’t want to fight over this,” he said. “We can keep being friends, but without politics.”
It is the same reason why he and Alexander try to avoid the topic when they get together to play Mortal Kombat, but if Russia absorbs Donetsk like it did Crimea, the cousins may end up in different countries.
“If we are joined to Crimea and Russia, I’ll leave here,” Igor said. “I’ll have to start everything over from scratch, but I don’t want to live in a strange country.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.