After the Sunflower movement protesters left the legislative chamber, former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) announced that he was going on a hunger strike. Lin said the government is using devious means to override public opinion and called on the public to take action to force the authorities to halt construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City.
Lin started his hunger strike on Tuesday, drawing the public’s focus again to the abolition of nuclear power, which is another issue that has a direct influence on the nation’s continued existence.
The cross-strait service trade agreement and nuclear power issues are reflections of an authoritarian government’s shallow understanding of the values of the public, while it continues to deny wider public participation by inviting experts to closed-door meetings to discuss issues. The government keeps repeating that it is governing in accordance with the law, but in addition to not facilitating a solution, its approach is endangering the nation.
Using nuclear power as an example, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is issuing heartfelt guarantees that it will meet the very highest security standards. Speaking to lawmakers during a question-and-answer session in the legislature, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said that the government has established measures and that he felt “very confident that we will be able to avoid a repetition of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster in Taiwan.”
While admitting that Taiwan is very likely to suffer composite disasters consisting of typhoons, earthquakes and even a nuclear disaster, Jiang insisted that the government is prepared, and that if disaster struck, it would evacuate the residents of Taipei and New Taipei City to central and southern Taiwan, adding that the military bases and gymnasiums in these areas can hold 1 million people.
At first glance, it would seem as if Jiang has a strategy for responding to a composite disaster, but on closer inspection, it is only a superficial solution of providing temporary homes for disaster victims. Other than stuffing people into a few houses, the government does not have other measures to deal with post-disaster problems, such as environmental cleanup and restoration, damaged farmland, social loss and psychological trauma — issues that continue to besiege Fukushima residents three years after the disaster.
Jiang talks about these issues — which could spell the end of Taiwan — with the same ease and simplicity as Ma talks about deer antler velvet.
Disaster prevention planning does not simply involve evacuation routes and housing; it also involves public disaster prevention awareness, drills, local government preparedness, execution, active cross-departmental coordination and cooperation across a network of social organizations. In other words, administrative preparation for disaster prevention planning does not only consist of high-tech experts writing reports and bureaucrats discussing the plans, it requires the participation of the affected people from every sector of society giving thorough consideration to every single aspect of the disaster prevention arrangements.
Perhaps the public should challenge all the candidates in the year-end seven-in-one elections by asking them some questions. What will they do if a composite disaster were to strike their area (which the premier has said is very likely)? How will they prepare for such a disaster or carry out post-disaster reconstruction? Will the government leaders of non-affected areas be willing to accept refugees from the disaster areas? And how are they going to work with the central government in carrying out its plans and arrangements?
If these candidates cannot, or are unwilling to, answer these questions, voters have no reason to believe that response plans for nuclear power accidents are nothing but empty talk and that in the end, people around the country would all be victims of the lack of political accountability.
Seeing the Ma administration’s arrogant disregard of public opinion and ignorance of national risks, Lin started his hunger strike at the Gikong Presbyterian Church — which was converted from his family home after his mother and twin daughters were murdered there on Feb. 28, 1980 — to bring public attention to the issue of nuclear power.
Even more worrying are the government’s reckless policies, disregard for the law, complete lack of credibility and inability to reflect on its actions and admit its mistakes. Just as in the case of the service trade agreement, the government’s only solution is to manipulate numbers and claim that it is following the law. The result will also be the same: intensifying social conflict and waste.
Only by converting the social force that is spreading through society into political pressure will it be possible to ensure political accountability, save democracy and secure a sustainable future for Taiwan.
Tu Wen-ling is a member of the board of Taiwan Democracy Watch.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs