The Sunflower movement has unexpectedly interrupted China’s management of Taiwan’s affairs. Still, perhaps the movement has offered Beijing a good opportunity to win the support of Taiwanese.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) has repeatedly modified its response to the student movement in subtle ways
On March 26, about a week after students occupied the legislative chamber on March 18, TAO spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) expressed his disagreement with the move, saying bluntly that “nobody wants to see interference with the progress of peaceful cross-strait development and economic cooperation.”
Clearly, this progress refers not only to economic cooperation, but also to peaceful development. In the short run, economic progress includes the plan to sign a cross-strait agreement on trade in goods in the wake of the signing of the cross-strait service trade agreement last year.
In the long run, it means the overall economic integration between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Undoubtedly, neither the service trade pact nor the agreement on trade in goods is purely a matter of economic cooperation, because the ultimate goal for both parties is to push forward cross-strait peaceful development. The medium-term goal is to launch political negotiations between Taiwan and China.
As Taipei continues to downplay Beijing’s call for political talks, Chinese authorities hope to realize economic integration between the two sides. In other words Beijing intends to use business to influence politics.
In terms of economic integration, after the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) in 2010, the most important task is the signing of the agreement on trade in services and goods. Beijing is having problems hiding its disappointment as economic integration is frustrated by the student movement.
After the government accepted the student movement’s demands that a law regulating the oversight of cross-strait agreements be passed before the agreement is reviewed, China slightly adjusted its attitude.
At the annual Boao Forum for Asia, TAO Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) said that the student movement had given him an insight, namely that China must gain an understanding of every aspect of the situation in Taiwan from now on, especially the lay of the land among ordinary people, as well as sentiment in small and medium-sized enterprises.
Beijing has finally come to realize that although it relies heavily on both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwanese business circles, including Taiwanese businesspeople investing in China, in the push for economic integration and peaceful cross-strait development, these two forces may no longer be sufficient to ensure the continued progress of peaceful cross-strait development.
Zhang, who expressed a hope that he would be able to visit Taiwan soon, perhaps during the first half of this year, even said in an amicable tone that he wished to have a direct dialogue with the student protesters.
His remarks clearly showed Beijing’s flexibility and confidence about handling the Taiwan issue. It also showed that Beijing is adding two important aspects to its future strategy for handling Taiwan.
First, China will strive to gain the support of Taiwan’s grassroots and small and medium enterprises.
With the ECFA and the service trade agreement, China used the same approach as with Hong Kong by allowing Taiwan to profit more from the agreements while giving the nation generous gifts to boost cross-strait economic ties.
In the context of its current frustration, how will Beijing go about working harder to understand the voices of Taiwan’s grassroots and small and medium-sized businesses, while easing concerns over China’s attempt to use business to influence politics and reduce strong opposition? This will be the next challenge for China.
Second, China is likely to increase exchanges with younger Taiwanese.
In recent years, Beijing has emphasized that it is pinning its hopes on Taiwanese when promoting cross-strait relations. However, its exchanges with the student protesters seem to be the weakest link in its handling of Taiwan policy.
The student movement against the service trade pact caused a lot of controversy, but it animated society enough to reverse the government’s policy. It displayed the strength of Taiwan’s younger generation and stunned Chinese authorities.
To be honest, whether in its attempts to get closer to Taiwan’s grassroots voters and small and medium-sized enterprises or its attempts to strengthen exchanges with Taiwanese youth, a key point for China is to abandon its arrogant attitude. It looks down at Taiwan as an inferior as if it is graciously allowing the nation to profit from its concessions.
On a more fundamental level, if China wants to truly put Taiwanese society at ease someday, it should push for progress in its own democratization.
John Lim is an associate research fellow in the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China