Fighting for nation’s future
A government should be of the people, by the people and for the people, but the public does not know who the people in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government are.
The international media says Ma is Taiwan’s president, and in 2009 Ma introduced himself to former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton as the nation’s president in El Salvador.
He claims to be president while traveling the world, but when returns to Taiwan, Ma identifies himself as the president of the Republic of China (ROC). This is duplicity and double dealing. He abuses Taiwanese credit to pursue his dream of having the nation annexed by China.
To expose Ma’s fake Taiwan presidency, the Sunflower movement continues, but under unequal conditions.
The student-led protesters used their bodies to protest against state violence.
However, after the bloody crackdown to evict protesters from the Executive Yuan, the government used legal intimidation and the media to continue its attack.
Fortunately, the international media stand on the movement’s side.
They insist on freedom of the press and the defense of justice.
A Polish journalist, Hanna Shen, was recently requested in writing by a Taipei Economic and Cultural Office official to retract her report.
The letter said an “appropriate retraction can be made to present the current picture of this news story and avoid misunderstanding among people in Poland and Taiwan,” as “making an analogy between a fully fledged democracy and the bloodshed that happened in Ukraine” not only presents a “completely wrong image of Taiwan,” it is also insulting.
In response, Shen wrote: “My newspaper has been publishing articles very critical of the Russian and Chinese governments as well as the former Ukrainian government, but we never received any letter from the representative offices of those countries asking us to retract anything, and those countries can’t be even called democratic.”
Similar scandals and bumbles are continually repeated.
The Sunflower movement has been going for almost three weeks, but Ma still does not understand its demands.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) returned to the chamber a few days ago and promised the students a law monitoring pacts with China would be enacted before the legislature reviews the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement.
Wang’s promise answered one of the movement’s demands: “Pass a bill first, then review the pact.”
However, it was rejected by the Presidential Office and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus.
People are protesting because they are worried about their futures and facing a job market controlled by Chinese investors.
The students oppose Ma’s criminal act of ethnic cleansing by diluting the nation’s population.
Older Taiwanese feel sorry that they are unable to provide a sound and healthy living environment for the younger generation. And they also feel shame for not being brave enough to openly protest against the KMT dictatorship.
Whenever any form of government denies people the right to pursue happiness, life and liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish the government and to institute a new one.
The Sunflower movement people should stick with their positive thinking and insist on their beliefs. The public respects and supports their persistence in the name of Taiwan’s future.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with