The government’s decision to convene a series of national economic conferences as part of its concession to end the three-week-long siege of the legislature by students is a good start. With activists planning to leave the chamber tomorrow, social order looks likely to return as the government prepares to reboot.
The legislature will be able to function normally again and start reviewing key draft bills, including a revision to fix a controversial urbanization law, and stock markets might begin to operate without political uncertainty.
The Cabinet said on Monday that it would commence preparatory meetings for the economic conferences scheduled to start later this month, paving the way to bring together government officials, experts and industrial representatives to brainstorm on the best ways to revitalize the economy via bilateral trade ties with China. The first meeting is expected to take place before the end of this month at the earliest and the rest may run through June.
Technology sector heavyweights, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀) and Acer Inc cofounder Stan Shih (施振榮), are considered possible attendees, although the Cabinet has not yet released a list.
The government should not limit the conferences to discussing the pros and cons of deepening trade with China or entering other bilateral trade agreements and regional trade blocs.
What must be addressed are the fundamental, underlying issues: the public’s anxieties about soaring cost-of-living expenses, stagnant payrolls, high housing prices, stubbornly high jobless rates and the fear of falling into a Japan-like lost generation — widespread agitation and despair over the future are the forces that drive the public to take to the streets.
The government needs to tackle more than simply whether the legislature should push through the service trade agreement as it stands. The trade deal is just the tip of the iceberg, as China is one of Taiwan’s biggest trade partners.
Instead, the government should expand the agenda of the conferences to cover fundamental economic issues of raising wages, beefing up industrial upgrades and transforming the economy to cope with intensifying global competition.
The government should stop intimidating the public with the threat that Taiwan will lose out to its rivals if it does not sign the service trade pact with China. An example is the Ministry of Economic Affairs attributing a lack of bilateral trade deals to the slower-than-10 percent growth in exports to the US and Europe last month, compared with South Korea’s expansion of more than 20 percent.
Insufficient free-trade agreement (FTA) coverage is part of the reason for lukewarm export growth. However, as it is time-consuming to sign FTAs, the government should come up with more options. More FTAs might help prop up the economy, but the question is whether that growth can trickle down to the public.
The government should do more to improve the country’s competitiveness, rather than just obsess about tearing down trade barriers.
Industrial representatives have suggested measures to boost competitiveness, including relaxations on hiring foreign talent and encouraging industrial upgrades, but this advice has not been taken.
Hopefully, government officials will be all ears when the national economic conferences take place.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations