Recent news of disagreement within society over the cross-strait service pact often involves a discussion of the widening gap in economic growth between Taiwan and its chief rival, South Korea. Notwithstanding envy and a resulting sense of discontent, Taiwan can compete and even surpass South Korea if bold strategies are implemented in lockstep with some structural reforms.
South Korea’s experience with free-trade agreements (FTAs) — first with Chile and subsequently with the US, the European Free Trade Association, Australia, Canada and soon with China — has largely proved successful, boosting exports of its automobiles, auto parts, petrochemicals, steel and consumer electronics industries. As for imports, clever negotiations created non-tariff barriers that have protected domestic sectors in agriculture, processed food, financial services, education and healthcare. One US trade negotiator privately told me that the South Korean trade negotiators and the North Koreans shared one characteristic: tenacious brinksmanship.
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) emphasis on following south Korea’s lead in FTAs would open up new opportunities for Taiwanese industries and businesses: For example, joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would usher in a slew of new opportunities to expand the tradeable sector of the economy. Firing up the existing set of growth engines would likely fail to generate the marginal growth spurt that would permanently push Taiwan’s growth curve up one or two notches above the current path.
To lift the growth curve from the current 1 or 2 percent GDP growth to 4 or 5 percent, Taiwan needs bold strategies and willpower to build the country’s future in targeted areas.
According to the IMF’s January report, the world economy between now and 2030 will rely on “smart” infrastructure investment to boost sluggish growth. More than half of this projected investment will fund an upgrade in infrastructure in the developed countries of North America and Europe in the name of higher energy efficiency. Large companies such as Siemens, GE, ABB and IBM are already coming up with proprietary solutions that combine designing solutions, providing services and selling equipment and components. For example, IBM’s Smart City and the eMobility by Siemens are setting the new standards in anticipation of the trillions of dollars to be generated in energy and infrastructure upgrades in advanced economies. What could be the opportunity for Taiwan, Inc? Taiwanese industries should build relationships with the solution providers and supply components, such as industrial sensors, communicative devices embedded in the Internet of Things as an integral part of the new ecosystems. The government should also help businesses to build partnerships with international funding organizations such as the World Bank and the IMF for infrastructure projects. In the new future of smart infrastructure, proprietary technology matters little, while the capacity to create partnerships and ecosystems matter.
China’s mainland and Hong Kong together account for more than half of Taiwan’s external trade and investment. It follows that China’s huge underdevelopment in healthcare would present new opportunities for companies in the pharmaceutical and medical devices industries. Samsung is harboring huge ambitions to overtake big pharma companies and take market share in MRI scanners from GE Health Care, Siemens and Philips. There is an opportunity for Taiwan to start a new race for affordable drugs and portable medical devices.
I am always struck by Taiwanese businesses having friendly relationships with their Japanese counterparts; similarly friendly relationships once tied South Korean companies to Japanese companies, but more recently, the relationships have turned cut-throat competitive. “My enemy’s enemy is my friend,” and Taiwanese and Japanese companies can create formidable challenges to some of South Korea’s national champions. For example, why did Taiwan and Japan choose Line, owned by a South Korean company, instead of developing an app of their own. HTC, though heralded as the superior Android device maker, has lost out repeatedly in marketing and sales battles against Samsung and LG. The technical prowess of Japanese companies is irrelevant in the face of the relentless attack of the South Koreans. What are the opportunities for HTC, Toshiba, Sharp and Sony? I should like to see an alliance of HTC, Japanese companies and Nokia-Microsoft emerge to combat Samsung.
Finally, growth should be in prosperous high-value services, such as medicine, education and insurance. These sectors create high-income jobs that are not easily tradeable and contribute to a higher quality of life for all, including international talent. Look to Singapore, where attracting immigration of university professors, designers, computer engineers, asset managers and commodity traders has boosted growth every year. Taiwan is not as cosmopolitan as Singapore, but within northeast Asia, it is more open and hospitable than China, South Korea or Japan. Taiwan’s national brand should be tied up with a higher quality of life compared with neighboring countries.
Taiwan and South Korea are the only two gold medalists in the world economy with a track record of more than 50 years of sustained growth above 5 percent annually. The path forward for Taiwan hinges on breaking new ground in a departure from the tried and worn-out path. This is Taiwan’s moment of truth.
John Shin is an independent economist based in South Korea, and from 2007 to 2012 was the managing editor of Financial Week and was also economics commentator for CNBC-TV.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and