On March 12, National Development Council Minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) gave a report to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) weekly Central Standing Committee meeting, saying that although a low inflation rate could increase real purchasing power, it would also increase the unemployment rate. It seems that he made the remarks in a bid to explain the recent sharp price hikes in the prices of daily necessities.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who doubles as KMT chairman, agreed with Kuan’s remarks, which has caused a lot of discussion and criticism among the public. Some even joked that the Nobel Prizes in economics should be awarded to Ma and Kuan for their “contributions” to the field of economics.
It was not very surprising to hear Ma and Kuan’s comments, because although the causal relationship between low commodity prices and rising unemployment is not absolute and could even be wrong, it still seems as if it were possible to use a traditional Phillips curve to describe a negative relationship between commodity prices and unemployment.
The current situation with high commodity prices accompanied by high unemployment is closer to stagflation, which cannot be described using a Phillips curve.
However, the government says that commodity prices are at a reasonable level, and that the jobless rate has declined constantly since 2009, which means that stagflation is not a problem. Since that is the case and everything then is alright, one can only wonder why Ma and Kuan made these statements with their absurdly mistaken cause-and-effect logic. It is no wonder they were mocked.
However, the public anger over this issue is quite confusing. Remember that Ma was elected president in a landslide victory in 2008, despite proposing the absurd policy of expanding domestic demand in order to fight inflation. By comparison, his recent statements really are not a very big deal.
How could the expansion of domestic demand possibly reduce inflation? In a normal situation, the expansion of domestic demand will only result in rising inflation. Anyone with a basic knowledge of economics should be stunned by such a claim, and I even thought that it was a campaign-time slip of the tongue or a joke.
Therefore, it was very surprising, when, after Ma came to power, the Council for Economic Planning and Development endorsed this policy, saying that in response to both the surging international oil prices and the US sub-prime mortgage crisis, which are causing the downturn of the global economy, the government plans to expand domestic demand by increasing local construction in order to relieve the impact of commodity price hikes and stimulate economic growth. The Ma administration’s level of economic expertise was thoroughly disappointing. Taiwan’s current economic predicament has showed that my concern back then was justified.
As the Chinese saying goes: “Three feet of ice is not the result of one cold day.” Judging from Ma’s and Kuan’s economic knowledge, there is no reason to be surprised over Taiwan’s economic situation.
Lin Hsuan-chu is an associate professor at National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Accountancy.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.