When a company saw its accumulated losses reach NT$233.08 billion (US$7.67 billion) as of the end of last year, it was long past time to come up with a sound financial restructuring. On Friday last week, Nanya Technology Corp, the nation’s largest DRAM chipmaker, revealed plans to reduce its paid-in capital by 90 percent to NT$23.96 billion, in the largest capital reduction among publicly traded local firms.
Many businesses implement a capital reduction program to develop a better ratio of debt to cash reserves. For Nanya — which suffered a complete erosion of its net worth due to years of slumping business, but has recently returned to profitability — capital reduction is one way to recover a part of its losses while allowing it make dividend payments possible on the back of higher distributable reserves.
Prior to Friday’s announcement, Nanya had been seeking ways to strengthen its financial health for several years by selling shares to Formosa Plastics Group’s subsidiaries to raise funds and by cooperating with Micron Technology Corp to gain advanced production technology and cut costs. However, these efforts did not help enough.
As with most DRAM companies in Taiwan, Nanya’s biggest challenge is the lack of a strong pool of proprietary technology. As developing next-generation technology alone means a complex, time-consuming and very expensive process, most local DRAM makers have preferred using proven designs from abroad under royalty agreements to expand their capacity and boost market share.
During their heyday — before 2007 — Taiwanese DRAM companies enjoyed a combined share of more than 20 percent in the global market. However, short of core technologies that would improve their production, their market share dropped to just 6.5 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, compared with South Korean companies’ 64.2 percent and US firms’ 29.3 percent, according to DRAMeXchange’s statistics. Years of industry downturn and a volatile market have caused some makers to either withdraw from the market (ProMOS Technologies Inc), shift business from standard memory chips into wafer foundry (Powerchip Technology Co), or become simply contract-based suppliers (Inotera Memories Inc and Rexchip Electronics Corp).
Nanya has managed to stay afloat in the DRAM business by focusing on manufacturing specialty memory chips and adjusting its technology development program with Micron. The firm finally reported its first annual profit since 2007 last year and it wants to pay some of those profits to shareholders. As such, capital reduction could quickly enhance shareholders’ value and create a short-term return on equity effect because the number of issued shares decreases.
However, from a long-term perspective, shareholders may not benefit from a capital reorganization scheme if it is based on a conservative outlook regarding future performance. This concern is legitimate if no new products are in the company’s pipeline, or the market’s competitive landscape remains unchanged or, most importantly, the government’s industrial policy cannot enhance manufacturers’ competitiveness in the global market.
One should keep in mind that Nanya will not be the last technology company in Taiwan to raise its book value per share in appealing to investors through a massive capitalization reduction. If the government’s industrial policy remains out of step with public expectations and lacks both foresight and a sense of national development, and if businesses do not learn from the challenges facing the DRAM, LCD and other industries by building a viable business model, there will be more like this to come.
Sharing profits with investors is all well and good, but what Taiwanese companies really need is higher investment in R&D, product innovation, technology advancement and brand-building. That is the only way to ensure sustainable development.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China