Now that the new legislative session has started, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has already convened a meeting to iron out the list of proposals that it wants passed. According to KMT caucus whip Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池), President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that the proposed service trade agreement must be given absolute priority during the current session.
It is no secret that China is looking to secure unification through economic means and to annex Taiwan by signing a series of agreements — from the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement to the service trade pact through to the proposed trade in goods agreement.
The government is fully aware that the service trade agreement is fraught with pitfalls and yet it insists on venturing down that path.
Signing the pact would be a mistake, and it is impossible to understand why the government is walking into this trap.
From the very outset, the Ma administration’s economic policy has been about tying Taiwan’s economy to the Chinese market, so that the nation’s economic growth rate has become excessively reliant on China.
As it stands, the correlation coefficient between the two nations’ economic growth rates has already reached 60 percent or more interdependency, suppressing the economy’s marginal growth rate and making it increasingly difficult to diversify risk.
In a recent interview, National Development Council Minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) said he no longer thinks the idea of the “Four Asian Tigers” is relevant.
According to Kuan, people must not cling to past glories and should instead strive to engage with the rest of the world, as is the global trend.
When Kuan talks of the “the rest of the world,” he is not talking exclusively about China, and the nation needs to break away from the Ma administration’s policy of excessive reliance on that market. Kuan’s comments were clearly directed at Ma, who has all along been looking to China to solve the economic malaise.
What China lacks is experience in the services sector and in business management models, and the business models for the services sector is precisely the biggest feature and greatest competitive advantage Taiwan has, as a country and as a brand.
In the global market, Taiwan and China have very different brands, each with its own positioning and particular market segment.
The service trade agreement in its current form is weighted toward China. If it does not take into account the future development of the Taiwan brand, serious consideration should be given before it is allowed through the legislature.
The minute the agreement is passed, the nation’s economic growth rate will be even more dependent upon China, and the Taiwan brand will thereafter become increasingly diluted, making the nation’s survival and future development difficult.
Now that the new legislative session is due to start, the Democratic Progressive Party, as the largest opposition party in the country, must fulfill its duty to provide checks and balances on the government, and respond to the concerns of the public.
It needs to throw itself into scrutinizing every clause, every line and every word of the agreement, and to refuse to allow it to pass in its current form.
The party should demand that the agreement be renegotiated, to devise a new agreement more weighted toward the strengths and competitive advantages of Taiwan’s service sector, to ensure the sector retains those strengths in a sustainable form, as is the wish of Taiwanese.
Kuo Chen-hero is an adjunct professor in the School of Business at Soochow University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry