Some local government leaders have made news recently by criticizing the nation’s twin woes of low wages and long working hours and announced plans to raise the minimum wage for temporary workers and allow more maternity and paternity leave.
The reactions from the Cabinet and other local governments have been covered in the media. Agree or not, one should notice that such announcements are carefully calculated moves by the leaders of these local governments because they know exactly how to grab media attention in an election year.
As an example, take Taipei’s minimum wage increases for the city government’s temporary workers starting in May. Increasing the minimum monthly wage by NT$3,592 to NT$22,639 and raising the minimum hourly wage from NT$115 to NT$133 can hardly convince anyone that such hikes would be able to improve the lives of low-wage earners. Further, there is no certainty that these wages would enable temporary workers — such as door guards, street cleaners and interns — to live in this city, where the basic living cost is far higher than other places. Moreover, the city government has thus far only targeted temporary workers, not regular city workers.
Yet, these cunning politicians use the media to play political games again by gaining public praise for daring to challenge the central government’s labor policy. However, they did not say that government agencies hire more temporary and dispatch workers than the private sector, nor did they shed light on any plan that could allow these workers become full-time employees, with higher wages and better benefits.
The issue is not with politicians’ attention-getting motives. When society has failed to set appropriate wage levels for all workers and the average degree of satisfaction with their wellbeing remains low, any plan to raise wages or increase paid holidays is never an issue of right or wrong, but rather of when and how.
However, the focus of the issue is the expectation that the action of one city can kick-start similar actions in other cities, with the expectation that such moves could spread wider to ultimately influence national policymakers. With the move to influence the public sector comes an even greater expectation that the private sector will follow suit and collectively help improve living conditions for Taiwanese.
Even so, the hard facts of reality are that today’s high-paying jobs could be tomorrow’s low-paying offers, considering the world’s rapidly changing economy affected by the global economy and ever-developing technology. It is also true that the public sense of wellbeing is not just about the number of paid holidays or wage increases, but also about government efficiency and capability in guiding the nation.
As such, raising the minimum wage, for instance, is not going to solve the problem of low wages. Instead, the nation has to think about training more people in the appropriate technical skills for jobs that provide higher wages and better prospects, while allowing businesses to provide more high-paying jobs in Taiwan.
That means both government and educational institutions have to review school curricula, provide more options for school admission and increase investment in vocational training so that workers and new graduates will possess skills necessary for promising careers.
It also means that the nation should speed up industrial improvements and economic transformation to enhance companies’ competitiveness and improve people’s wellbeing, otherwise debates over minimum wage increases or other trivial benefits will continue making headlines that benefit just a few people, especially shrewd politicians.
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
As the COVID-19 pandemic spins out of control, many parts of the world are experiencing shortages of medical masks and other protective equipment. I am studying in Washington state, which at the time of writing is the US state that has suffered the largest number of deaths from the novel coronavirus. The week before last, UW Medicine — an organization that includes the University of Washington School of Medicine and associated medical centers and clinics — sent its volunteers an e-mail asking the public to make masks and donate them to hospitals. Attached to the message was a mask donation