The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) talks between the US and Japan have once again been delayed due to agricultural issues.
Judging from US President Barack Obama’s speech at Michigan State University on Feb. 7, in which he said that the US will adopt a series of measures to promote agricultural exports, the US will continue to put pressure on Japan and demand that it remove all customs duties.
Whether the Japanese government will make major concessions on the duties for rice, beef, pork, wheat, dairy products and sugar will be crucial to reaching an agreement.
Taiwan’s average import duty on agricultural products is 13.88 percent, while in Japan it is 21 percent. By comparison, the same figure for the US is 4.7 percent, for Australia 1.3 percent and for New Zealand 1.4 percent, which places Taiwan and Japan in a group of more protectionist countries.
If Taiwan wants to join the TPP, it must, in addition to preparing itself to remove protectionist duties on agricultural products and open up the domestic market, also avoid repeating the mistakes of past trade talks.
First, prior to participating in trade cooperation talks, a country must assess the possible impacts on industry and prepare a negotiation strategy based on this assessment to maximize benefits and minimize losses.
Although common international models for analyzing the impact of regional trade agreements — such as the Computable General Equilibrium model, the Global Trade Analysis Project model and the Gravity model — also will be used in Taiwan, the nation does not have the detailed basic data for individual industries that are required for using these models that Japan, the US and South Korea possess.
In particular, basic agricultural, forestry, fishery and livestock data are incomplete, which often results in major discrepancies between assessments and the actual situation. The result is distrust among industrial circles and negative consequences when planning followup policy.
The same models used with different parameters and assumptions create different results, which leaves room for academics and political parties with different viewpoints to manipulate the results. One example is the assessment of the impact of the free economic pilot zones on the agricultural industry, which can vary from one end of the spectrum saying that it only will have a minor impact, to saying that it could bring losses upward of NT$180 billion (US$5.94 billion).
This is why the authorities, in addition to creating a complete record of the data required for analysis, must invite academics and experts to carry out deeper analysis of any preliminary conclusions to be able to make appropriate adjustments to minimize the mistakes.
Second, prior to planning a strategy for the talks and to maintain secrecy and avoid unnecessary complexity, the government must communicate fully with the concerned industrial organizations. Since there is not sufficient industrial data, it would be easy to misjudge the situation and spark an industrial backlash after the talks, which would add to the uncertainty when trying to pass an agreement. The best example of this is the controversy surrounding the cross-strait service trade agreement.
To deal with this problem, the competent authorities should communicate preliminary ideas formed in consultation with academics and experts to agricultural organizations and promote two-way communication, while also including these organizations in an advisory group to form a more complete policy decision.
Furthermore, other countries have carried out major agricultural policy reforms to be able to join the proposed TPP — partly to meet the needs of talks, partly to raise awareness among their agricultural populations and prepare them for conditional deregulation of key products.
For example, the Japanese government has proposed the establishment of an intermediary agency to handle agricultural land, reformed the policies for operating income security, adjusted rice policies and implemented a set of direct subsidies. It has also made budget allocations to cover for these subsidies: The budget for Japan’s Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries for this year has increased by ¥29.1 billion (US$289 million) from last year.
Taiwan’s agricultural authorities, on the other hand, have not been able to keep up with the progress of talks when it comes to adjusting industry structure and subsidies.
Finally, membership in regional trade organizations will have a practical and a psychological impact on farmers. Policies to deal with the practical impact can be devised from estimates based on mathematical models, but the psychological impact will be closely dependent on the public’s confidence and trust in the government.
When the Japanese government decides on the concessions it makes during the TPP talks, it will also have to listen to public opinion. In Taiwan, the public’s low satisfaction with, and trust in, the government’s policy implementation will increase the difficulty of talks.
A majority of Taiwanese probably agree that the nation cannot isolate itself economically. The question is whether the government has made the necessary preparations to protect the industries and individuals that will be affected so that the public can remain calm and confident.
This, and avoiding repetition of past mistakes, will be crucial to Taiwan’s success in joining any regional trade organizations.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs