Cities in southern Taiwan are competing to be the site of a new international baseball village, hoping to reinvigorate the sport in the country and lay the foundations for strengthening domestic teams.
The Greater Tainan Government planned to construct an international baseball village in Heshunliao (和順寮), Annan District (安南), but after the bidding process for the contract failed on three separate occasions due to lack of a response, the city decided to skip the planning and estimates stages and jump straight into construction. Meanwhile, it sent a planning committee to the US to observe spring training centers and baseball stadium facilities.
The Greater Kaohsiung Department of Sports, having revisited plans to build a baseball village in Gangshan District (岡山), has decided that the outline needs to be reviewed to ensure that newly constructed facilities there do not become just another vacant mosquito breeding ground.
Meanwhile, in Chiayi City, local baseball aficionados wanted to see the city government build a “Taiwanese Williamsport” — after Williamsport, the birthplace of Little League Baseball in Pennsylvania — near the Lantan Reservoir (蘭潭水庫). Nothing has come of this either.
Good intentions are great, but it is also important to get the policy right. There are three main problems with the idea of having an international baseball village.
First, there is some doubt as to whether the authorities have what it takes to implement the policy. The financial resources available to local governments are insufficient for the range of facilities and support that an international baseball village would require and the national Sports Administration’s concerns that the initiative would end up with just more disused buildings, or as an excuse to line the pockets of corrupt officials, might have it all descend into a game of passing the buck.
Second, the policy would require extenisve planning and several kinds of expertise — regarding coaching philosophies and the development of umpires, talent scouts and qualified sports injury prevention and first-aid professionals — that are not available here.
The development of baseball faces many challenges and, although it is painful to say, the prospect of international success in tournaments in the near future remains remote.
Third, there is the issue of how such a sports village would fit in the local area, in terms of the environment, topography, transportation and industry, and what it would mean for other government policies. Perhaps, most important would be the degree to which the international baseball culture would be embraced locally.
Those caveats aside, the creation of an international baseball community need not be a zero-sum game or a competition between separate and isolated entities.
Chiayi could plan for its “Williamsport” to develop little league baseball; Greater Tainan could consider hooking up with baseball teams and building a set of baseball stadiums — modeled on the home of the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York — in which foreign coaches and players from teams overseas could teach; and an international baseball village in Greater Kaohsiung could concentrate on providing facilities for different levels, like the Hanshin Koshien baseball park near Kobe, Japan.
If involved parties can further differentiate the lines and space between main and secondary stadiums, and upgrade their administration, stands, training, boarding and teaching facilities, this would be great for the development of tourism, catering and industry in the northern part of Kaohsiung.
If these local governments can imagine models for baseball facilities in their respective areas that conform to their own strengths and interests and can cooperate with the others, there is no reason that the Sports Administration should not welcome the plans.
The Sports Administration should support and encourage the local governments in the south to take the initiative on this vast project, which can only be good for the development of Taiwanese baseball.
Mark Lin is an assistant research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.