ore than a month has passed since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) delivered his New Year’s Day address, calling the nation to work in unity to bolster the economy. The same old slogan gets repeated year after year, until it gets to sound like a stuck record. Even though it is just a placebo, many people still hope that something may come of it. From workers’ point of view, the kind of “good economy” they hope for is quite simple: stable employment, reasonable work conditions and wages, and health and safety in the workplace.
However, looking back over what workers have experienced in recent years, there has been nothing but successive disappointments that add up to despair. The jobless rate has been over 4 percent for a long time, while temporary jobs and other poorly paid kinds of work are ubiquitous. Real salaries have fallen badly and employees are haunted by the specter of unpaid leave.
Many workers can barely eke out a living and some have even died on the job, exhausted from trying to make ends meet. It seems that the more Ma’s government talks about bolstering the economy, the harder life gets for working people. You have to ask whose economy our leaders are improving and what kind of economy Taiwan really needs.
The government’s mindset about improving the economy over the years has been long on repetition but short on analysis. Its strategy revolves entirely around a neoliberal framework, while government officials responsible for running the economy have an almost religious faith in the alleged economic panaceas of liberalization and flexible employment.
On the one hand the government keeps favoring big business by cutting taxes and suppressing wages — by keeping the minimum wage down and importing lots of foreign migrant workers. On the other hand, having pushed through the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, the government now blindly promotes the follow-up cross-strait trade in services agreement, as well as free economic pilot zones, which they plan to expand to cover the whole country, turning Taiwan into a free-trade island.
If they have their way, the nation will end up as one big concession to capitalist corporations and the already highly unequal distribution of wealth will get even worse.
Such is the “blood-and-sweat economy” in Taiwan. Under this economic model, workers find themselves slaving away in poorly paid, tough and exhausting conditions. This can be seen from the hours that local employees have to work, which remain among the longest in the world.
Despite working such long hours, workers’ incomes fall far behind those in competing countries, and employees often have to quietly accept demands for illegal overtime, just to keep their jobs, while work conditions deteriorate.
Further, wages never rise and indeed keep falling relative to the ever-climbing cost of living, including clothes, food and travel, not to mention soaring house and apartment prices. These factors have plunged people’s lives into a vicious cycle of hardship.
Taiwan must discard this “blood-and-sweat” economic mindset. Instead, the nation needs significant wage increases and meaningful improvements in work conditions and to promote economic justice for workers through a fairer and more transparent system of distribution of economic benefits.
Otherwise, with the government “bolstering the economy” only for a handful of corporations, the nation’s economy will end up in a state of structural collapse.
Son Yu-liam is secretary-general of the Taiwan Labor Front.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs