No one could be entirely sure that the tusks — great curves of hard dentine coated in enamel — would actually burn. To be on the safe side, park wardens doused them in gasoline and placed them in a pyre. When set alight, the ivory burned fiercely, watched by Kenyan Cabinet ministers, diplomats, conservationists and, most importantly, television crews and photographers, who relayed the images all over the world.
That was the morning of July 18, 1989, when a bonfire was made of 12 tonnes — or nearly £2 million (US$3.28 million) worth — of ivory in a spectacle designed to send the message that the killing of elephants and the trade in their tusks had to be stopped. In the preceding decade, numbers of Africa’s largest land mammal had fallen from 65,000 to 17,000.
“To stop the poacher, the trader must also be stopped, and to stop the trader, the final buyer must be persuaded not to buy ivory,” then-president Daniel Arap Moi said. “I appeal to people all over the world to stop buying ivory.”
Remarkably, they did. And soon after that, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) placed ivory in its Appendix I, effectively creating an outright ban on the trade.
The site where the pyre was lit, 3.2km inside the gates of Nairobi National Park, is marked by a grandiose stone tomb. It sits in a neglected picnic site where a scattering of concrete benches surrounds a faded sign that recounts the historic day and concludes: “As you picnic here, reflect and join Kenyans in saying ‘Never again.’”
However, for all the imploring, it has happened again. In the past five years, the poaching crisis has returned in response to rising demand from newly wealthy markets in Asia.
In the Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania, home to one of the two largest remaining populations of African elephants, numbers had fallen from 50,000 in 2007 to 13,000 by the end of last year. Up to 100 elephants a day are thought to be poached for their tusks in a slaughter worse than that of the 1980s, according to conservationist Allan Thornton, president of the Environmental Investigation Agency, the international organization that provided much of the evidence on which the original ban was based.
The rhino — prized for its horn, which is thought in some cultures to have medicinal properties — is in similarly dire straits. It is in this context that up to 50 world leaders will converge on London on Thursday for a conference on the illegal wildlife trade that may represent the best hope for reversing the trend.
“Hopefully we are building to a moment similar to 1989, although the current situation is far more damaging to Africa’s elephant populations,” Thornton said.
“Poaching and the illegal ivory trade appear to still be gaining ever greater momentum to supply the markets in China and Japan,” he said.
The 1989 ban and the accompanying publicity turned Western public opinion against ivory. Within a year, the price of ivory had plummeted from tens of thousands of pounds for a carved tusk to just £1 a kilo.
Among the “range states” — countries where elephants live in the wild — there was disagreement over the 1989 ban. Several southern African nations, including Botswana and Zimbabwe, argued that stockpiled ivory, which they said had been collected from elephants that died of natural causes, should be sold at auction. The first of these legal auctions took place in 2002. A second “one-off sale” was allowed in 2007, despite fierce opposition from conservationists, who objected both to the auction and to CITES’ approval of China as a bidding nation. They warned that China was in no position to control the illegal trade and that the 70 tonnes it bought would spur demand.
WildAid director Peter Knights watched what happened next. The presence of legal and illegal ivory in the market created ambiguity for consumers as well as cover for criminal enterprises looking to launder their supply from poachers.
“We thought we had saved the elephant and then we found ourselves at square one again,” Knights said.
His organization is calling for an end to ivory sales and the destruction of existing stockpiles.
Knights believes that the 21st century equivalent of the Nairobi bonfire began in the unlikely setting of Denver, Colorado, in a warehouse on the edge of the Great Plains region of the US. It was here, at the offices of the US National Wildlife Property Repository, that six tonnes of ivory seized over time from smugglers entering the US was destroyed. It is a sign of the times that ivory is now crushed rather than burned — environmentalists had been concerned about carbon dioxide emissions.
Similar stockpiles have been crushed in the Philippines and Kenya, while Hong Kong has also agreed to destroy much of its reserve. China followed suit last month, feeding seven tonnes of seized ivory into a tarmac-crushing machine, but even this still represents only a fraction of existing stockpiles.
The London conference is expected to see rich nations pledge hundreds of millions of pounds to an emergency fund to finance anti-poaching efforts in the range states, but seasoned campaigners will be watching for commitments from the ivory-consuming countries.
Knights, who compares attempts to stop poaching in Africa with failed efforts to strangle the illegal drug trade in drug-producing countries, warns that only a “demand-side” approach will work. WildAid has persuaded famous Chinese athletes such as basketball star Yao Ming to lead a public awareness campaign to persuade Chinese consumers not to purchase ivory.
“We have tried the supply side and it clearly isn’t working,” he said.
Meanwhile the killing continues. There are no elephants in Nairobi national park, but two weeks ago, only a rifle shot away from the site where the ivory was burned, a female rhino was slaughtered — in what is supposed to be among the most heavily protected parks in east Africa.
Spotlight on the ivory trade
An estimated 25,000 elephants are killed each year by poachers, many of them linked to organized crime. In some places the species is close to being wiped out.
The illegal ivory trade in Africa was said to see its worst year ever in 2012.
In 2011, authorities seized more than 23 tonnes of ivory, which represented about 2,500 individual elephants killed.
A 1989 ban outlawed the international trade in ivory. Since then, countries with elephant populations have twice been allowed to sell stockpiled ivory taken from elephants that died naturally.
In the past few years, ivory has been destroyed in the US, Gabon, Kenya, China, France and the Philippines. This is now mostly done by crushing rather than burning, to avoid polluting the atmosphere.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under