A report in a recent edition of the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine said that the 12 richest people in Taiwan use overseas tax havens, and have offshore companies and accounts that they use to send their assets overseas. The report said that the National Taxation Bureau has a hard time investigating these practices and that tens of billions in taxes is lost each year as a result.
After that news came out, one of the wealthy businesspeople named in the magazine’s report who owns a newspaper responded to the magazine’s claims through a front-page story which said that sending money generated by businesses in Taiwan and China overseas to buy property is legal. The newspaper report featured commentary from experts and academics vouching for the legality of that act, saying that it is unfair to shareholders for the head of the company they have a stake in to not use legal tax-saving measures.
These latter remarks are hard to agree with. Anyone with a little knowledge of finance should know that the bank accounts of companies that use tax havens are private and that these enterprises find it easy to skirt the legal regulations and tax duties of the country they are investing in, such as Taiwan, as well as those of the country being invested in, like China.
Taiwanese businesspeople often leverage triangular trade to keep profit in tax havens, a practice which has long been defined as tax avoidance by income tax law.
However, last year, legislators joined hands to stop a bill aimed at stopping the formation of what are known as controlled foreign corporations used by offshore companies in tax havens.
Then there are the significant reductions imposed over the years on estate, gift and business income taxes, as well as capital gains tax exemptions and a plethora of other tax incentives and subsidies. These measures have impeded the implementation of fair tax reforms. How are Taiwanese supposed to believe that all of these policies are not the result of clandestine work by interest groups? The way in which the wealthy pretend to pay their taxes as required by law and use legal means to save on taxes is highly insulting to the nation’s hardworking wage and income earners who pay their taxes honestly. Are offshore accounts of the wealthy spick-and-span and not used to avoid taxation?
Take a Supreme Administrative Court ruling on individual income tax made in 2010: The ruling was about a company that went public on the over-the-counter bulletin board and, after its board approved a cash capital increase, the firm immediately wired US$5 million to an offshore banking unit account in Taiwan — which for all intents and purposes is viewed as foreign — under the guise of paying what they called OEM (original equipment manufacturing) fees.
The next day, the money flowed back into five Taiwanese dummy accounts and was used as a false form of subscription to capital stock. Once the National Taxation Bureau discovered the activity, it fined the company and people who provided the dummy accounts in excess of NT$100 million (US$3.3 million) on the grounds of making false claims for US$5 million in expenses and failing to disclose the taxable income they derived from the dummy accounts. However, in essence, this case was more about company and securities fraud than tax evasion.
Are the way in which offshore companies pay commissions and management fees in tax havens an action conducted by the minority, or is it just the tip of the iceberg?
The Ministry of Finance not only does not take the issue of losing government revenue seriously, it also fails to look into the matter and ascertain how offshore banking unit accounts are being used. All the ministry does is complain that a cross-strait tax agreement has not been signed yet and how it is difficult for them to check the taxes of overseas companies.
It is obvious that the ministry is waiting for things to blow over, so it would seem that when it comes to the offshore bank accounts of the rich, all the public can do is trust that the wealthy have a conscience and will publically disclose details of their bank transactions Perhaps with the recent tainted oil and real-estate speculation scandals, it is time that the wealthy came out and proved that they are fulfilling their duty to pay tax. This is all they can do if they want to prove their innocence.
Huang Shih-chou is an associate professor at the Taipei College of Business.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations