Step by step, Chinese authorities are making life tougher for officials looking to spirit assets and family members out of the country to avoid close scrutiny and strict currency controls.
As part of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) crackdown on pervasive corruption, China’s so-called “naked officials,” those who have moved their spouses, children and assets overseas while they remain at home, will not be considered for promotion, state media reported.
Also, China’s anti-graft body has asked newly promoted officials to disclose their assets and any foreign residency, while late last month, about 2,000 village leaders in Guangzhou had to hand over their passports to stop corrupt officials from fleeing, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported.
Many officials have been taking advantage of a Hong Kong investment scheme to squirrel away more than US$1 million each, which includes buying “residency” in faraway African nations, since the scheme is not open to Chinese residents.
A record number of Chinese have gained permanent residency in places such as the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau for themselves and their families, although most will never visit these countries and often choose to live elsewhere.
In downtown Hong Kong, Asia’s financial center, agents openly tout for wealthy Chinese to join the scheme — at a fee of about HK$200,000 (US$25,800) — that requires them each to invest HK$10 million.
Launched by the Hong Kong government more than a decade ago to stimulate an economy battered by the SARS crisis, the Hong Kong Capital Investment Entrant Scheme has proved a hit with mainland Chinese who, though technically barred, see it as a means to invest money near home without the tight controls imposed by Beijing. Although governed by Beijing, Hong Kong has a high degree of autonomy.
The investors see it as an eventual way to procure Hong Kong residency and the perks that go with it: lower taxes, better welfare benefits and less government scrutiny of personal assets.
The scheme, which some agents say offers a 5 percent annual interest rate, welcomes investment from foreign nationals, including those from Taiwan and Macau, but specifically bars nationals of Afghanistan, Cuba, North Korea and mainland China.
According to the latest Hurun Report, close to two-thirds of China’s millionaires have emigrated or plan to do so. However, of those, only 15 percent are looking to give up their Chinese nationality. Most just want permanent overseas residency.
The estimated number of Chinese officials and their family members shifting assets offshore varies among academics, with some putting it at more than 1 million in the past five years. One Hong Kong-based immigration agency said about a third of the 500 applicants it processed last year were Chinese officials or legislators.
“A huge number of Chinese officials have moved family members and assets offshore, but continue to work for the Chinese government,” said Guobin Zhu (朱國斌), a law professor at City University of Hong Kong.
“Hong Kong’s investment scheme is a means for Chinese officials to move assets overseas,” he said. “Beijing can’t tolerate this phenomenon any more. They must feel a sense of crisis.”
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) said he was unaware of the details of the issue, but said: “You will have noticed that recently we have issued a whole series of anti-corruption measures. I’m certain these will be effective.”
In Hong Kong, a female agent carries a billboard reading “Invest and immigrate to Hong Kong” and hands out flyers telling applicants they do not have to declare the source of their assets — a key selling point to those seeking to skirt capital controls and hide assets from prying state eyes.
Applicants for the scheme more than doubled to a record 3,380 in the third quarter of last year from a year earlier, official data showed. There are now more than 17,000 Chinese investors with foreign residency in the program, accounting for 87 percent of all investors, according to Reuters’ calculations based on Immigration Department data.
Agents say part of their fee goes toward buying would-be investors residency in countries such as the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau. Investors claiming to be resident in those two African nations made up 13,300 of the total — most of whom will never have stepped foot on their new-found domicile.
“Immigration to Hong Kong is way easier than to many other countries,” said a 45-year-old applicant from Shenzhen, who gave his last name as Liu.
He acquired Gambian permanent residency along with his wife and child in 2011.
“It only takes six months to get my Hong Kong identity card and I will apply for a Hong Kong passport after the [seven-year] time limit,” he said.
Officials at the Immigration Department in the Gambia were not willing to talk about the issue.
Hong Kong-based Weng Li International Immigration Consultants Ltd says on its Web site that applicants do not need to declare the source of their assets and can “retain their China household registration status” — which means their Chinese business interests and identity remain unaffected.
“It’s so easy,” an agent at immigration service firm Worldway Group’s office in Guangzhou said.
“You simply buy residency in these African countries,” she added, asking not to be named due to the sensitive nature of the issue.
All it takes for an entire family to gain residency in Guinea-Bissau is a copy of a Chinese passport, birth and marriage certificates, a clean criminal record, 12 passport photos and 15 working days, according to Worldway.
Immigration agents said there were several ways to bypass China’s capital control limit — individuals cannot exchange more than the equivalent of US$50,000 a year in foreign currency — and shift money into Hong Kong: through underground banking networks, by hiring people to open multiple bank accounts in Hong Kong, or simply by moving cash across the border, often strapped to the traveler’s body.
Some agents said Chinese officials would always find a way to dodge the country’s passport controls.
“Many of them have two identities — one as a government official and one as a civilian,” said one Hong Kong-based immigration agent, who did not want to be identified.
Hong Kong’s Security Bureau said it was aware of the large number of Chinese buying permanent residency from the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau to qualify for the scheme, which, it said, it was reviewing.
Additional reporting by Alexandra Hoegberg and Clare Baldwin
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under