In November last year, I spoke at the UN Security Council for the first time in 13 years and it struck me how different the mood is now. In September 2000, the world seemed very different. We were trying to articulate the new security order in the decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Of course there were challenges, but the atmosphere was light — positive even — as we discussed eradicating poverty in the developing world.
This time, the mood was dark, and the first days of the year have made it darker still. Scroll down any day’s news summary and there will be stories of terrorism and violence perpetrated in the cause of a false view of religion. Some of it is committed by non-state actors and some of it by state actors, but all of it is committed in the context of division and conflict defined by differences of religious faith.
This is the new struggle of the 21st century. We will not win it unless we fight its root causes, as well as its ghastly consequences.
Illustration: Mountain people
Today, in an arc that stretches from the Far East through the Middle East to the streets of cities in Europe and the US, we face a scourge that has taken innocent lives, scarred communities and destabilized countries. It is a threat that is constantly evolving, growing and mutating to counter our fight against it.
The extremists propagating this violence have networks of outreach to young people and know the power of education, whether formal or informal. Extremists are filling young minds with the belief that anyone who disagrees is an enemy — and not just their enemy, but God’s enemy.
The security debate has understandably often focused on the consequences. After an attack, states consider immediate security measures. Terrorists are hunted down. Then we get back to our daily lives, until the next time it happens.
Yet lasting change depends on dealing with the root causes of extremism. Of course, politics plays its part and the extremists are good at jumping on the back of political grievances. However, the soil in which they plant the seeds of hate is fertilized with ignorance.
That is why we need to start thinking of education as a security issue.
The extremists justify killing in the name of God. This is an obscene perversion of proper religious faith and it is a menace for the harm that it does directly as well as for the damaging division and sectarianism that it nurtures indirectly — every killing is a human tragedy. However, it also causes a chain reaction of bitterness and hatred. There is real fear in the communities plagued by such extremism, fear that paralyzes normal life and pushes people away from each other.
Globalization is intensifying and multiplying this extremism. Not limited by borders, it can spring up anywhere. We are more connected than at any point in human history and increasingly more people come into contact with those who are different from them. So the need to respect a neighbor who is not like you is much greater, but the scope to identify him or her as an enemy is also greater — and this is not only about Islamic extremism. There are extremist acts perpetrated against Muslims because of their religion and today there are fanatical Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists who disfigure the true nature of their faith.
That is why education in the 21st century is a security issue for all of us. The challenge is to show young people who are vulnerable to appeals from terrorists that there is a better path to having their voice heard, a more meaningful way to engage with the world.
The good news is that we know how to do this. I use my Faith Foundation only as one example. Our schools program promotes cross-cultural dialogue among students aged 12 to 17 around the world. Reaching students in more than 20 countries, our program connects students via a secure Web site, where they interact from their classrooms under the guidance of trained teachers.
Through facilitated videoconferences, students discuss global issues from a variety of faith and belief perspectives. They gain the dialogue skills required to prevent conflict by breaking down religious and cultural stereotypes. For schools in the poorest areas, we use special arrangements, because they cannot access the Internet themselves.
To be sure, we are only a drop in the ocean, but we now have experience in more than 1,000 schools, more than 50,000 students have been taught and we are working in countries as diverse as Pakistan, India, the US, Jordan, Egypt, Canada, Italy, the Philippines and Indonesia. I have been privileged to witness these students becoming at ease with the cultures, faiths and beliefs that inspire so many people around the world.
There are many other fantastic examples of this type of work, but they lack the resources, weight and recognition that they need.
We need to mobilize to defeat extremism and we need to act globally. All governments must take seriously their responsibility to educate young people to accept and respect people of different faiths and cultures.
There is no issue that is more pressing. There is a real danger that religious conflict will replace the ideologically based struggles of the last century in an equally devastating form.
It is up to all of us to show people that we have a better idea than the extremists have — to learn from each other and live with each other, and this needs to be a core part of young people’s education.
Tony Blair served as British prime minister from 1997 to 2007 and is now the special envoy for the Middle East Quartet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.