Ill winds are blowing through Taiwan. The old regime has been restored and the will to reform has faltered. Core values are being eroded and morale is at a low. In the face of all this, ordinary Taiwanese have become disoriented and are at a loss as to what the future holds. A general sense of malaise has descended; people feel that all is futile and there is no way out. It is as if people are imprisoned combatants, their will to fight back dissipating as the stale air in the cell slowly thins, depriving them of oxygen.
The hard-won democracy that the public wrested from the authoritarian regime has been watered down to just one election every four years. The electoral system itself has been corrupted by money, politics and the games that are played. It is now a contest fought between the corrupt and the corrupt.
Participation in democratic elections in this country, without the financial clout of party assets or the support of local factions, is a futile exercise, a mug’s game. Elections are a foregone conclusion, the roster of our elected officials decided by the financial clout or local support the political parties can bring to bear, and these representatives will simply toe the party line and protect the interests of the factions rather than act as spokespeople for ordinary Taiwanese.
Irrespective of which party or faction is in power, the winner is always big business and the suits, the financial groups and multinational corporations. They are also the ones who are really running the country.
When judicial oversight bodies intentionally fail in their duties in order to secure the favor of those in power, they not only become puppets to those who would abuse power, they also give these people confidence to carry on with impunity. The only constant is that it is the general public who are the victims.
This is how it is that people have unwittingly been giving their children milk tainted with melamine, consuming drinks full of plasticizers and preparing food with mislabeled cooking oils.
And after all these food scares, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) chum Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) can still keep his position as minister of health and welfare. It was only because of these concerns that people discovered that senior government officials have been using imported olive oils and did not need to worry about what was on their plates. Meanwhile, unscrupulous capitalists are out of harm’s way in the upscale, downtown Taipei apartment complex The Palace, paid for with borrowed cash.
When an incompetent leader is never called on to take responsibility for his mistakes and is allowed to keep his position — all smiles — there is clearly something terribly wrong with politics in this country.
Equally, when the majority of the economic benefit from the people’s collective toil ends up in the capitalists’ overseas bank accounts, it is evident that social justice is not working.
When the government’s main source of revenue comes from earners of average incomes while a handful of people at the top of the economic pyramid pay proportionately low taxes compared with their incomes despite having robbed society of most of its wealth, it is obvious how politics and money are conspiring to exploit ordinary people.
Despite how much people may rail against this pernicious system, they find themselves absolutely helpless, pushed around and wounded with no way of getting the justice they deserve.
The rich and powerful do as they please, and no matter how much people protest, nothing changes. This has led to a sense of disenchantment not only in politicians, but in the overall political process. And when this happens, people tend to disengage from politics and public affairs. They withdraw into their own discrete worlds, looking for alternate indulgences to interest them. Those who have not yet given up still ask themselves whether they can actually change anything, or what is to happen in the future.
The public needs to wake up. It is held hostage by politicians, and while imprisoned in this way there can be no “rule of the people.” If people do not organize, they will not be able to effect change. If they do not maintain their unity, they will just be seen as a temporary nuisance and will not be able to break out of the shackles that bind. As the problem is political in nature, the only solution is a proactive engagement in politics. This is also the only real way to put an end to the collective sense of despair pervading Taiwan.
Politics concerns everyone. Democracy means “rule of the people.”
Technocratic specialization can be instrumental in better meeting the needs of the public, but in no way should it be an excuse for the manipulation of power by the few.
Political parties should facilitate the effective operation of a democracy, but they are not, nor indeed should be, the only means through which the public can participate in public affairs.
Putting politics back in the hands of ordinary people does not mean allowing individual people to identify themselves as “blue” or “green,” it means liberating politics, taking it away from professional politicians and big business and enabling civil society to have a say in political decisionmaking.
This is the only way the structural malaise that politics in this country has sunk into can be cured, so that it is the public, and not finance and capital, that is represented.
Only when members of the public become more engaged in politics and start to care about public affairs, demanding more transparency in political decisionmaking so that they can be more active participants in the political process, will it be possible to prevent the privileged minority from robbing the people of their national resources.
Only when this happens will democratic politics return to its original purposes: Reflecting the public will and ensuring accountability so that fairness and justice can truly thrive in this country.
Huang Kuo-chang is a research professor at Academia Sinica’s Institutum Iurisprudentiae.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs