The young dentist was uncuffed and led to his seat in the courtroom. A few rows back, his mother watched motionlessly, her hands gently clasped together as if in prayer.
Jeon Seong-jin is being punished for a crime that is not a crime at all in most of the world. A Jehovah’s Witness, he has refused to become a soldier in South Korea, where all able-bodied male citizens are required to serve about 21 months in the army.
More than 660 conscientious objectors have been jailed each year in South Korea, on average, from 2004 to 2012, far more than any other country. Eritrea is second, but imprisoned only about 50 conscientious objectors last year, according to the official Web site of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Members of the religion refuse military service because they believe the Bible forbids warfare.
Even where conscription still exists, governments often allow conscientious objectors to serve their countries without bearing arms, but not in South Korea. Jeon began his 18-month sentence in 2012 and expects to be released in March.
Even behind bars, Jeon continues a legal battle. He appeared in court last month as part of his lawsuit demanding that conscientious objectors be given alternative service instead of prison. The court rejected his case last week.
“Seong-jin can use his medical expertise to serve his country instead of being in jail,” said his mother, Yoon Hyun-jin, wiping away tears at last month’s trial.
Her 26-year-old son was cuffed again, bound in ropes and taken back to prison.
South Koreans who refuse to take up arms often find little support from their compatriots and have trouble finding work after their release from prison.
Hundreds of thousands of soldiers face each other along the Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea, one of the most heavily fortified places in the world. The 1950 to 1953 Korean War ended with an armistice rather than a peace treaty, leaving the Korean Peninsula technically at war.
“It’s reasonable to jail people who don’t go to the army,” said Jeong Won-seok, a 32-year-old computer programmer. “Who wants to go the army, anyway? Most go because they have to and sacrifice a lot of freedom for it. What kind of conscience outweighs the sacrifice made by those who serve in the army?”
South Korea is better known for its catchy K-pop songs, technology and economic growth than it is for the more than 17,500 conscientious objectors who have been imprisoned since 1950. Most are Jehovah’s Witnesses, who number about 100,000 in a country of 50 million and often face stigma in its largely conformist society.
More than 50 men have refused to serve in the past decade because of nonreligious personal beliefs or political reasons, including 25-year-old Kim Dong-hyun.
“Right now, I only have two choices: military or prison. Of the two, I think prison is the more peaceful choice,” Kim said. “At least in prison, I don’t have to train to kill.”
Kim, like Jeon, was sentenced to 18 months, which today is a typical sentence for conscientious objectors in South Korea. Under South Korea’s military-backed dictatorship in the 1970s and 1980s, imprisonment lasted up to seven years.
The UN Human Rights Committee criticizes South Korea for not recognizing conscientious objectors and failing to give them alternatives to military service — a violation of freedom of thought, conscience and religion recognized in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. South Korea has been party to the covenant since 1990, but the country has made no major changes to stop the jailings.
The South Korean Ministry of National Defense cites North Korea’s security threat as a key reason for not recognizing conscientious objectors. In 2010, a South Korean warship sank in the Yellow Sea after an alleged North Korean attack, killing 46 sailors. The same year, four South Koreans were killed by North Korean shelling of a coastal island. About 28,500 US troops are deployed in South Korea to help deter North Korean aggression.
Each year, South Korea conscripts more than 26,000 men and sends between 300 and 800 conscientious objectors or draft evaders to prison, according to Seoul’s Military Manpower Administration, which handles conscription matters.
The government does not distinguish between draft evaders and conscientious objectors like Jeon.
Society’s caustic view of conscientious objectors has much to do with draft-dodging by celebrities and society’s privileged. The country has known sons of rich and powerful men bribing or cheating their way out of drafts.
In 1997, South Korean presidential hopeful Lee Hoi-chang lost both votes and reputation after his two sons were accused of draft evasion. Other men have damaged joints and ligaments, and even feigned insanity to avoid the army.
There are legitimate ways to avoid becoming a soldier: South Korea allows alternative civil service for men with minor disabilities, special skills or high academic achievements. Even men who cover their bodies with tattoos get alternative service because the army rejects them, but attempts to allow alternative service for conscientious objectors fell apart in 2008.
The South Korean Ministry of National Defense said it scrapped the proposal because two-thirds of the country opposed it in opinion polls. Proponents of alternative civil service say such rights should not be curbed by public opinion.
The consequences for conscientious objectors go beyond prison. Two years ago, the government sent a notice to Jeon’s hospital to fire the dentist or be charged with violating the Military Service Act, which prohibits employers from hiring draft evaders. Jeon can continue his medical practice after his release, but he will not be able to work in the public sector because of his criminal record.
Lee Jo-eun, an activist at Seoul-based group WithoutWar, which organizes anti-war protests and workshops for conscientious objectors, said they are often shut out of jobs at big companies and in the public sector, and often have to settle for part-time work.
Jeon has said in court that he felt he had no choice but to reject military service. Two years ago, he told judges that even as a child, he could not bear the guilt he felt playing with a toy gun.
His beliefs have not wavered in prison.
He began his unsuccessful appeal last month by telling judges: “My conscience has never felt more comfortable.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations