Distinct Taiwanese identity
Alexis Sanders lists history as one of eight criteria of national identity, but fails to point out the historical facts that distinctly differentiate between Taiwan and China in identity (Letter, Jan. 17, page 8).
Taiwan was ceded to Japan permanently in 1895, and Taiwanese were the subjects of US air raids during World War II, renounced by Japan in 1945, massacred in the 228 Incident by Chinese Nationalists in 1947 and victimized in the White Terror era under martial law for 38 years — the longest in human history.
Legally, the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty and the 1952 Taipei Treaty have put Taiwan in an indeterminate status that has to be decided according to the UN principle of self-determination.
Politically, Taiwanese carry passports that are different from Chinese passports. Taiwanese use New Taiwan Dollars, provide military service in Taiwan, pay taxes to Taiwan and directly elect their president, who is different from the Chinese president.
Sanders mistakenly refers to Chinese as “compatriots” of Taiwanese “on the other side of the [Taiwan] Strait.” This is as wrong as referring to Britons as compatriots of Americans or Canadians on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.
The Taiwanese populace mainly consists of Hoklo, Hakka, Mainlanders and Aborigines. None of them should be excluded. Sanders’ exception of the Aborigines is worse than President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) comment about “trying to treat the Aborigines as people.”
Ma likes to use the term zhonghua minzu (中華民族) or “Emperor Huang’s descendants” to implement his father’s will of “ultimate unification.”
He welcomes the name “Chinese Taipei” imposed on Taiwan for the same reason. His popularity has dropped partly because of his motives.
Sanders also said that Taiwanese and Chinese were “the Chinese people on both sides of the Strait.” If he were right, Chinese would not have deployed more than 1,000 missiles aimed at Taiwan.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Focusing on the environment
I was shocked and saddened to hear that a friend of mine, one of Taiwan’s most distinguished foreign professors, is considering leaving Taiwan because of the headaches which the air pollution in Taipei causes him. Given that air pollution is a proven killer (“Air pollution a top 10 killer: study,” Dec. 19, 2012, page 6), and that Hong Kong also recently lost one of its most prominent antipollution voices, Anthony Hedley, a professor at the University of Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, Asian countries must urgently realize that cutting pollution and improving the environmental situation are part and parcel of improving the “quality of life,” and that mindless economic growth alone does not bring about health, happiness and security.
The same basic argument is also delivered by the amazing movie, Beyond Beauty: Taiwan from Above (“Protecting nature is not political,” Nov. 28, 2013, page 8) and the stunning landscape photography of Wu Cheng-chang (吳政璋) (“Exposing Taiwan’s true landscape,” Oct. 13, 2013, page 12), which created more than a few ripples across the environmental landscape of Taiwan.
While the expansion of Taipei’s Mass Rapid Transit system has brought some relief, more public transport must be developed in Taipei as well as in other cities.
More importantly, electric vehicles must be phased in, so that within a decade, 50 percent of all vehicles are electric, and all within two decades.
The electricity should not come from polluting fossil fuels or dangerous nuclear power (“Nuclear is no answer,” Mar. 28, 2011, page 8), but from renewable sources of which the nation has more than plenty (“Taiwan has many renewable energy resources: activist,” Jun. 27, 2013, page 3).
In a similar vein, Asian countries must curb their catastrophic and mindless consumption of emblematic species.
The main reason for the steep decline of tigers, elephants, rhinos and sharks around the world is their extravagant or superstitious consumption in East Asian countries.
Writers have repeatedly called for the end of shark consumption (“Saving biodiversity,” Feb. 14, 2011, page 8; “The plight of sharks,” Jun. 26, 2011, page 8), and again call on the Ma administration to follow the lead of the Chinese government (“Tide turns against shark fin soup in China,” Jan. 17, page 9) and once and for all outlaw the consumption of shark fins and any other shark products in Taiwan.
Bruno Walther
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.