The Cabinet’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) recently said that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has executed 97 percent of his campaign promises so far. Since there is a gap between the public impression of Ma’s performance and the commission’s figure, some people have given in to their curiosity and begun a thorough examination of the president’s policy execution.
According to the commission’s report, Ma has proposed a total of 19 major policies. These policies can be divided into three main categories.
The first category includes policies that anyone could interpret any way they choose. In other words, there is no “management by numbers,” no concrete objectives and no achievement rates on which the public to base any examination.
These policies include improving language and information education, eliminating the gap in digital education, taking care of disadvantaged groups, financing small and medium-sized enterprises, hosting more large international conferences, promoting medical tourism, transforming the nation into an economic and trading hub for the Asia-Pacific region, assisting the information industry in carrying out its global deployment, building a political environment based on mutual trust and loosening regulations on financial, educational and tourist policies in order to promote market liberalization and boost competitiveness.
There are many policies of this kind, which could be said to be rich in description, and judging from the commission’s calculations, the execution rate of this kind of policy is probably about 100 percent.
The second category includes the policies that are political slogans more than anything else. Ma said that the production value of the medical tourism industry is about NT$18 billion (US$595.6 million) per year, and said it is expected to create 30,000 jobs in Taiwan in four years. Ma added that opening up Taiwan to Chinese tourism is likely to create 140,000 jobs in four years, generating a profit of NT$380 billion.
Ma has also pledged to promote the nation’s energy efficiency by 2 percent per year during his time in office, allocate funds on a yearly basis to help women enter the workplace, create 100,000 jobs during his first term and establish a fund of NT$150 billion to take care of 4,000 farming and fishing villages and 600,000 farming and fishing households nationwide. A lot has been written about the success of these policies, but it is very hard for the average Taiwanese to notice much of them.
The third category contains policies that do not fall in the first two. These are policies that can actually be examined, and Ma has failed to carry out many of them. These policies include lowering the unemployment rate to 3 percent, establishing a Taiwan award (台灣獎) for cultural masters, creating a Hoklo-language production center under the Taiwan Public Television Service and creating a national Hakka-language radio station.
Ma has also failed to reduce the class size in elementary schools to about 25 students per class, implement a special deduction of NT$25,000 for young people who receive advanced education, push for Taiwan’s entry into the UN, provide funds for youth to revitalize idle public facilities — the so-called “mosquito houses” (蚊子館) — and demand that the Chinese Communist Party withdraw its ballistic missiles targeting Taiwan.
Since the first day of his first term, Ma has done little to push for this kind of policy. Are these the policies the commission included in the 3 percent of policies that have not been executed?
Chiu Li-li is a Greater Tainan city councilor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations