The Cabinet took action this week to bolster the chances of people whose lives are dependent upon an organ transplant and to bar the trade in organs. Both moves were long overdue, but now it is up to the legislature to pass the changes into law. It should do so as soon as lawmakers return from their recess on Feb. 20.
The proposed amendments to the Human Organ Transplantation Act (人體器官移植條例) will allow people to donate kidneys to non-family members, require those who go overseas to procure an organ transplant to provide details of their operation to the Ministry of Health and Welfare and outlaws the brokering of or profiting from organ donations. Another proposed change would speed up the actual transplant procedure by eliminating the need to get the ministry’s prior approval for each kidney transplant operation.
The Taiwan Organ Registry and Sharing Center Web site shows that 8,332 people are waiting for a transplant, 6,275 of whom are waiting for a kidney. There are 1,155 people on the liver list, 154 on the heart list and 62 waiting for a new pancreas.
However, the Web site says that an average of 150 donors are found annually, with only about 300 organ transplants each year, meaning people could wait for years for a kidney or other organ to become available.
The center, health authorities and others have worked for years to overcome cultural barriers and encourage more people to sign up to donate their organs after their deaths.
A survey conducted by the center last year found that 70 percent of respondents were willing to donate their organs after they die, but only 1 percent have made the effort to have their consent listed on their National Health Insurance cards.
However, even when donors are willing, sometimes their families are not and the Medical Care Act (醫療法) still requires hospitals to get the consent of a dead donor’s family before harvesting the person’s organs. This shows that more education is needed.
At present, the law bars donations from living donors who are not related to the patient. Eliminating this restriction will open the way for more donations to be made. While the Cabinet’s decision this week is laudable, it did not go far enough. Taiwan remains in a gray area when it comes to harvesting organs from convicted prisoners and, through omission, encouraging people to participate in questionable transplant operations abroad by allowing the National Health Insurance system to cover the cost of post-transplant treatment and medication.
A majority of Taiwanese who do go overseas to receive a transplant go to China — accounting for 88.6 percent of all overseas transplants from 2000 to 2011 — where reports of illegal or unethical harvesting of organs are rife.
The legislature in November last year passed a legally binding resolution requiring the then-Department of Health, now the Ministry of Health and Welfare, to require major medical institutions and physicians to register the country where organs were source and information on the hospital and doctors where a transplant is carried out when organ recipients return to Taiwan and apply for postoperative health insurance coverage. This will help the authorities determine exactly where in China the donated organs are coming from and could aid international efforts to end the practice of harvesting organs from dead inmates or others who did not consent to such actions.
There is still much work for the Cabinet and the legislature to do to help improve Taiwan’s organ transplantation infrastructure and ethics.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under