The Cabinet took action this week to bolster the chances of people whose lives are dependent upon an organ transplant and to bar the trade in organs. Both moves were long overdue, but now it is up to the legislature to pass the changes into law. It should do so as soon as lawmakers return from their recess on Feb. 20.
The proposed amendments to the Human Organ Transplantation Act (人體器官移植條例) will allow people to donate kidneys to non-family members, require those who go overseas to procure an organ transplant to provide details of their operation to the Ministry of Health and Welfare and outlaws the brokering of or profiting from organ donations. Another proposed change would speed up the actual transplant procedure by eliminating the need to get the ministry’s prior approval for each kidney transplant operation.
The Taiwan Organ Registry and Sharing Center Web site shows that 8,332 people are waiting for a transplant, 6,275 of whom are waiting for a kidney. There are 1,155 people on the liver list, 154 on the heart list and 62 waiting for a new pancreas.
However, the Web site says that an average of 150 donors are found annually, with only about 300 organ transplants each year, meaning people could wait for years for a kidney or other organ to become available.
The center, health authorities and others have worked for years to overcome cultural barriers and encourage more people to sign up to donate their organs after their deaths.
A survey conducted by the center last year found that 70 percent of respondents were willing to donate their organs after they die, but only 1 percent have made the effort to have their consent listed on their National Health Insurance cards.
However, even when donors are willing, sometimes their families are not and the Medical Care Act (醫療法) still requires hospitals to get the consent of a dead donor’s family before harvesting the person’s organs. This shows that more education is needed.
At present, the law bars donations from living donors who are not related to the patient. Eliminating this restriction will open the way for more donations to be made. While the Cabinet’s decision this week is laudable, it did not go far enough. Taiwan remains in a gray area when it comes to harvesting organs from convicted prisoners and, through omission, encouraging people to participate in questionable transplant operations abroad by allowing the National Health Insurance system to cover the cost of post-transplant treatment and medication.
A majority of Taiwanese who do go overseas to receive a transplant go to China — accounting for 88.6 percent of all overseas transplants from 2000 to 2011 — where reports of illegal or unethical harvesting of organs are rife.
The legislature in November last year passed a legally binding resolution requiring the then-Department of Health, now the Ministry of Health and Welfare, to require major medical institutions and physicians to register the country where organs were source and information on the hospital and doctors where a transplant is carried out when organ recipients return to Taiwan and apply for postoperative health insurance coverage. This will help the authorities determine exactly where in China the donated organs are coming from and could aid international efforts to end the practice of harvesting organs from dead inmates or others who did not consent to such actions.
There is still much work for the Cabinet and the legislature to do to help improve Taiwan’s organ transplantation infrastructure and ethics.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry