In the face of global economic and trade liberalization, Taiwan’s establishment of the free economic pilot zones is about to enter a second phase, which is also the focus of the government’s economic policy at the beginning of the year.
The core concept of the free economic pilot zones is to loosen regulations and innovate systems within the zones. If the zones are successful, they can be duplicated across the country.
The policy also serves as preparation for Taiwan’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, but the success of the zones depends on the government’s ability to implement the policy promptly.
Through liberalization regulations concerning manpower, goods and cross-border capital movements, the policy aims to attract a large number of local and foreign companies to promote industrial development within the zones. In addition, the zones are intended to promote five potential sectors: intelligent logistics, international healthcare services, value-added agricultural processing, financial services and education innovation.
Through Taiwan’s information service advantage, the intelligent logistics industry will be able to build an e-commerce platform and expand the scale and depth of processing in the zones.
The international healthcare services industry hopes to boost the development of medicare, biotechnology, medicine, rehabilitative care, health enhancement and other sectors.
The value-added agricultural processing industry hopes to promote the brand-imaging of Taiwanese agricultural products.
Observers often think that the opening measures could be harmful and that the import of Chinese agricultural products could threaten to Taiwanese products.
However, this contradicts fact. If products are sold from the zones to other areas in Taiwan, the government will levy taxes on them without any preferential measures. Products that are not currently allowed to be imported will still not be able to enter Taiwan, just as is in the case of “bonded factories.”
The spirit of the free economic pilot zones is to loosen regulations in order to attract more business investment in Taiwan, establishing factories and companies and creating more job opportunities. By attracting greater investment, the goal is to boost Taiwanese exports.
Through processing, the export of local agricultural products and semi-finished goods will create added-value for Taiwanese products. This will benefit the nation’s agricultural, engineering and service industries and increase farmers’ income while creating job opportunities.
Trade competition in East Asian countries is extremely tough, as these countries compete over speed in signing free-trade agreements and establishing free-trade zones. China has actively pushed for the establishment of the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, Japan is planning for a free-trade zone and South Korea established the Incheon Free Economic Zone in 2003. If Taiwan wants to succeed, the key is speed, speed and speed. If the nation hesitates on the free economic pilot zones, there will be no chance of success.
In order to break the economic deadlock, the ruling and opposition parties must cooperate. They should promptly pass the draft special statute to launch the second phase of the establishing the free economic pilot zones.
This is the only way for Taiwan to boost its economic growth with internationalized, liberalized and advanced industries.
Chu Yun-peng is an economics professor at National Central University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under