Mass surveillance programs used by the US and Britain to spy on people in Europe have been condemned in the “strongest possible terms” by the first parliamentary inquiry into the disclosures, which has demanded an end to the vast, systematic and indiscriminate collection of data by intelligence agencies.
The inquiry by the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee says the activities of the US National Security Agency (NSA) and its British counterpart, the Government Communications headquarters (GCHQ), appear to be illegal and that their operations have “profoundly shaken” the trust between countries that considered themselves allies.
The 51-page draft report, obtained by the Guardian, was discussed by the committee on Thursday. Claude Moraes, the rapporteur asked to assess the impact of revelations made by the whistle-blower Edward Snowden, also condemns the “chilling” way journalists working on the stories have been intimidated by state authorities.
Illustration: Yusha
Though Snowden is still in Russia, members of the European Parliament are expected to take evidence from him via video-link in the coming weeks, as the parliament continues to assess the damage from the disclosures.
Committee members voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to have Snowden testify, defying warnings from key US congressmen that giving the “felon” a public platform would wreck the European Parliament’s reputation and hamper cooperation with Washington.
While 36 committee members voted to hear Snowden, only two, both British Conservatives, voted against. It is not clear yet whether Snowden will testify. If he does, it will be via a live video-link rather than prerecorded as initially planned.
“Snowden has endangered lives. Inviting him at all is a highly irresponsible act by an inquiry that has had little interest in finding out facts and ensuring a balanced approach to this delicate issue,” said Timothy Kirkhope, a Conservative member of the European Parliament. “At least if Snowden wants to give evidence, he will now have to come out of the shadows and risk his location being discovered.”
The British Liberal Democrat member Sarah Ludford denounced the Conservative position.
“To ignore [Snowden] is absurd. The issue of whether the intelligence services are out of control merits serious examination in Europe as in the US. The Tories’ [Conservatives] ostrich-like denial is completely out of step with mainstream opinion in both continents, including Republicans in the US and [German Chancellor Angela] Merkel’s center-right party in Germany. But their line is consistent with the obdurate refusal of Conservatives at Westminster [the British parliament] to clarify and strengthen safeguards on snooping by GCHQ,” she said.
The Moraes draft describes some of the programs revealed by Snowden over the past seven months — including Prism, run by the NSA, and Tempora, which is operated by GCHQ.
The former allows the NSA to conduct mass surveillance on EU citizens through the servers of US Internet companies. The latter sucks up vast amounts of information from the cables that carry Internet traffic in and out of the UK.
Delivering 116 findings and recommendations, the report says Western intelligence agencies have been involved in spying on “an unprecedented scale and in an indiscriminate and non-suspicion-based manner.”
It is “very doubtful” that the collection of so much information is only guided by the fight against terrorism, the draft says, questioning the “legality, necessity and proportionality of the programs.”
The report also: Calls on the US authorities and EU states to prohibit blanket mass surveillance activities and bulk processing of personal data; deplores the way intelligence agencies “have declined to cooperate with the inquiry the European Parliament has been conducting on behalf of citizens”; insists mass surveillance has potentially severe effects on the freedom of the press, as well as a significant potential for abuse of information gathered against political opponents; demands that the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands revise laws governing the activities of intelligence services to ensure they are in line with the European Convention on Human Rights; and calls on the US to revise its own laws to bring them into line with international law, so they “recognize the privacy and other rights of EU citizens.”
The draft, still to be voted on by the chamber, has no legal force and does not compel further action, but adds to the growing body of criticism and outrage at the perceived intelligence abuses.
Separately, the European Parliament has drafted new legislation curbing the transfer of private data to third countries outside the EU and setting stiff conditions for the information transfers. Hopes of getting the new rules into force before elections for the parliament in May are fading because of resistance from the UK and EU governments.
“This is a tough issue, even thorny,” Greek Minister of Justice Charalampos Athanasiou said. “There are different views in the member states. I can’t be sure about being successful.”
Greece took over the running of the EU for six months last week.
Moraes condemned the way the Guardian was forced to destroy the Snowden files it had in London and says the detention at Heathrow of David Miranda, the partner of the former Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, constituted “an interference with the right of freedom of expression” under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The report is also highly critical of the data exchange scheme Safe Harbor, which allow swaps of commercial information between US and European companies. The draft also questioned the Swift scheme supplying European financial transactions information to the US to try to block terrorist funding and the supply of information on transatlantic air passengers.
The European Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Viviane Reding says the Safe Harbor scheme is flawed and may need to be frozen.
She wants to make it harder for the big US Internet servers and social media providers to transfer European data to third countries. She also wants to subject the firms to EU law rather than secret US court orders.
The Moraes report says the Web companies taking part in Safe Harbor have “admitted that they do not encrypt information and communications flowing between their data centers, thereby enabling intelligence services to intercept information.”
He calls for the suspension of information sharing until companies can show they have taken the all necessary steps to protect privacy.
The report calls on the European Commission to present by this time next year an EU strategy for democratic governance of the Internet, and warns there is currently “no guarantee, either for EU public institutions or for citizens, that their IT security or privacy can be protected from intrusion by well-equipped third countries or EU intelligence agencies.”
“Recent revelations in the press by whistle-blowers and journalists, together with the expert evidence given during this inquiry, have resulted in compelling evidence of the existence of far-reaching, complex and highly technologically advanced systems designed by US and some member states’ intelligence services, to collect, store and analyze communication and metadata of all citizens around the world on an unprecedented scale and in an indiscriminate and non-suspicion-based manner,” the report says.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs