In 2012, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said Taiwan would join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) within eight years.
Only now, after having procrastinated for two years, has he taken action toward that aim by ordering the Cabinet carry out the preparatory work necessary to seek membership in the TPP and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) next month.
He has also ordered former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) form a group that the opposition parties will take part in to promote partnership among the public.
This flurry of activity is clearly related to the visit of Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) to Taipei last month.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) recently sent delegations to Tokyo and Seoul to observe the strategies Japan and South Korea adopted when negotiating the TPP, the RCEP and other free-trade agreements. The party’s China Affairs Committee is also expected to make its stance on the matter clear in an upcoming report.
The TPP and RCEP are more than international trade pacts. Beneath the surface, they are part of a political struggle between the US and China, the two major powers in the Asia-Pacific region.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP face pressure from Washington and Beijing, and it will be hard for them to keep things going just by making declarations. They each need to take concrete action and face up to their many challenges.
First, Taiwan will not be able to take part in the first round of TPP talks between 12 nations. Even if Taiwan were able to participate in the future, the rules of the game will have already been established and Taiwan will be at the mercy of the other participating countries, having to accept the high demands of total market liberalization and zero tariffs.
A few years ago, the Ma administration overlooked the importance of public opinion and communication with the legislature and decided unilaterally to ease the nation’s reopening to US beef imports, a move that badly damaged its reputation.
Last year, the service trade agreement signed with China was full of backroom deals.
Since TPP negotiations would involve the adoption of a confidentiality agreement, it is highly doubtful whether the Ma administration will be able to communicate honestly and openly with the opposition and industries that could be affected if Taiwan joins the trade group.
Second, Ma is now widely viewed as incompetent and as a lame duck president. At the end of this year, he will face the pressure of local elections.
It must be asked whether he really has what it takes to get involved in such a difficult task, or is he merely toying with the US and going to leave the real problems to whoever succeeds him?
If Washington demands that Taiwan open up its pork market in exchange for entry into the TPP, would the Ma administration have the guts to make such a promise?
After Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe assumed office for the second time, he used his strong public support to quell domestic opposition to the TPP by leading his party in two landslide victories in the Diet. At the same time, he sang the same tune as US President Barack Obama. In February last year, he signed a guarantee for five sensitive industries, assuring that they would not be liberalized if Japan joins the TPP.
Despite this, US-Japanese negotiations on the TPP ground to a halt last month.
Under former South Korean president Lee Myung-bak, South Korea witnessed strong domestic protests over the signing of a free-trade agreement with the US, but at least Seoul was able to get Washington to open up its automobile industry to South Korean companies. After South Korean President Park Geun-hye took office, she saw that Japan was working for TPP membership and has followed suit, expressing an interest in joining the group.
South Korea has always kept its wits about it, and, before deciding to join the TPP, the country signed free-trade agreements with seven of the countries that will be involved in the upcoming round of TPP talks, while gaining an abundance of experience from the negotiations.
The South Korean National Assembly also passed the Trade Procedure Act and requested that the government submit an assessment report and periodically hold public hearings and consultations with it.
The Japanese and South Korean experiences clearly show that the ability of leaders to handle pressure, skillful political maneuvering, a stable legal foundation and a certain amount of transparency are the only ways to guarantee success in foreign trade talks.
The only question remaining for Taiwan is whether the Ma government is equipped with these skills.
Liu Shih-chung is the director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s International Affairs Department.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under