The people who made a hippie dream come true do not look the part. Instead of tie-dyed T-shirts, the campaigners who masterminded the legalization of recreational marijuana use in Colorado wore dark suits and ties to celebrate the world’s first legal retail pot sales. Instead of talking about the counter-culture, they spoke of regulations, taxes and corporate responsibility. They looked sober, successful and mainstream.
With Washington State poised to follow Colorado later this year and activists in a dozen other states preparing to fight for legalization, the once-illicit cannabis plant is now a legitimate industry, with advocates, interest groups and lobbyists.
The Marijuana Policy Project, the Drug Policy Alliance, the Medical Marijuana Industry Group and the National Cannabis Industry Association are just some of the groups now vying to shape public opinion and government policy in the US.
SOCIETAL VIEWS
For the likes of Diane Goldstein, a former lieutenant commander with the Los Angeles Police Department who became an activist for the group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), the groundswell of support for legalization is welcome evidence that society has turned against the drug war.
“It’s no longer dangerous for people to have a rational view about a failed policy,” she said.
Yet for Kevin Sabet of the group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, which opposes legalization, the celebratory scenes in Denver pot shops last week is proof that a Big Tobacco-style campaign of manipulation has prevailed.
He said that many Americans are unaware that cannabis can cause long-term damage to people’s health, especially among young people, and that the American Medical Association opposes legalization.
“It’s Big Tobacco redux,” said Sabet, who also directs the Drug Policy Institute at the University of Florida’s Department of Psychiatry.
What was a fringe movement four decades ago has evolved into a slick, well-funded network based in Washington, he added.
“It was: ‘We need to cut our ponytails, take off our tie-dye shirts, put on our Macy’s suits, go to [the US] Congress and start lobbying state legislators,’” Sabet said.
In addition, Sabet said that the industry has been mimicking the tobacco playbook in portraying its product as virtually harmless, while using chemistry and marketing to turn consumers into addicts.
According to Sabet, the cannabis industry comprises a vast coalition of lobbyists; billionaire sponsors like George Soros and the late Peter Lewis; and profit-seeking investors like Privateer Holdings and the ArcView Group.
SMARTENING UP
An estimated US$1.43 billion worth of legal marijuana was sold for medicinal purposes last year and that figure is likely to increase exponentially with the advent of legal recreational cannabis.
There is no doubt that the legalization industry has come a long way since Keith Stroup founded the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws in 1970 with US$5,000 from the Playboy Foundation.
Activists say that smartening up their act was a natural step.
A few years ago, Mason Tvert wore scruffy T-shirts while urging Colorado college students to back legalization. After winning that fight with a ballot initiative in the November 2012, he became the Marijuana Policy Project’s communications director and moved to a smart, well-staffed office near the domed State Capitol in Denver.
“Yeah, I wear a suit these days,” he said with a smile.
Yet what is more important is the campaign’s focus on a core message: Cannabis is safer than alcohol, Tvert said.
Buttonholing legislators and policymakers was crucial, said Michael Elliott, executive director of the Denver-based Medical Marijuana Industry Group.
“We’re lobbying for regulation and taxation. That’s why we’re beside the State Capitol. We’re down there every week,” he said.
Tvert and Elliott attribute the momentum behind legalization to public recognition that prohibition has been a fiasco that has led to needless imprisonments and fiscal waste.
Pro-legalization forces still have meager resources and can barely be said to have lobbyists, Goldstein said, adding that LEAP’s speakers are unpaid.
LOBBYING FORCE
Mark Kleiman, a drug legalization expert at the University of California, Los Angeles, said that the marijuana industry is not a united one with shared interests and should not be viewed as a single lobbying force.
For instance, many of those who have licenses to grow and sell medicinal marijuana stand to lose heavily from legalizing recreational use because it would expand competition and depress prices, he said.
Colorado’s medicinal sector obtained the exclusive rights to sell recreational cannabis for nine months and although it is a temporary shield, medicinal growers in Washington fear an impending disaster.
In contrast to profit-driven industry lobby groups, Kleiman said that marijuana’s legalization efforts so far have been led by advocacy groups and funders like Soros, who have stood to make little or no financial gain from the movement.
“These are not mostly people who are making a living from cannabis and are, therefore, lobbying for laws in their industrial interests,” he said, but added that that would likely change with more legalization and money.
“The marijuana lobby is going from being purely ideological to being industrial,” Kleiman said.
Could some of today’s tokers become tomorrow’s industry spin doctors?
“Ten years from now, will there be an evil marijuana lobby devoted entirely to preventing any effective regulation or taxation? Absolutely, but that’s not the reality at the moment,” he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under