Harvard University biologist Martin Nowak wrote that cooperation is “the architect of creativity throughout evolution, from cells to multicellular creatures to anthills to villages to cities.” As mankind now tries to solve new, global challenges, we must also find new ways to cooperate and the basis for this cooperation must be altruism.
The desire to help others without consideration for ourselves is not just a noble ideal. Selflessness raises the quality and elevates the meaning of our lives, and that of our descendants — our very survival may even depend on it. We must have the insight to recognize this and the audacity to say so.
Humanity faces three monumental challenges: ensuring that everyone has decent living conditions, improving life satisfaction and protecting our planet.
Traditional cost-benefit analysis struggles to reconcile these demands, because they span different time frames. We worry about the state of the economy from year to year, but we consider our happiness over the course of a lifetime, while our concern for the environment will mainly benefit future generations.
ATTAINABLE GOAL
Yet an altruistic approach requires few trade-offs. A considerate investor will never speculate recklessly with his clients’ life savings, despite the potential gain for himself. A caring citizen will always think first how his actions affect his community. A selfless generation will exercise care with the planet to leave a livable world to its children. Altruism makes us all better off.
This vision of the world may seem idealistic. After all, psychology, economics and evolutionary biology have often claimed that humans share an essentially selfish nature. However, research conducted over the past 30 years indicates that true altruism does exist and can extend beyond kin and community to encompass the welfare of humans generally, as well as that of other species.
Moreover, the altruist does not have to suffer for his good deeds; on the contrary, he often benefits indirectly from them, while the selfish actor often creates misery for himself, as well as others.
Studies have also shown that an individual can learn to be altruistic. Neuroscientists have identified three components of altruism that anyone can develop as acquired skills: empathy (understanding and sharing the feelings of another), loving kindness (the wish to spread happiness) and compassion (a desire to relieve the suffering of another).
Societies can also become more altruistic and may even enjoy an evolutionary advantage over their more selfish counterparts. Research on the evolution of cultures suggests that human values can change more quickly than our genes.
Therefore, if we are to engender a more caring world, we must first recognize the importance of altruism and then cultivate it among individuals and promote cultural change in our societies.
STRIKING A BALANCE
Nowhere is the need to cultivate this recognition clearer than in our economic system. The unrealistic pursuit of endless quantitative growth places intolerable strains on our planet and widens inequalities. However, reversing that growth would create other problems, forcing people to compete for diminishing assets and resources would spread unemployment, poverty and violence.
So a balance must be struck: The global community must lift 1.5 billion people out of poverty, while the excesses of the world’s richest consumers — which cause the vast majority of ecological degradation — must be limited. We do not need to impose more taxes to achieve this, but we can persuade the wealthy that the eternal pursuit of material gain is both unsustainable and unnecessary for their own quality of life.
This concept of “sustainable harmony” can be promoted by publishing indices of personal well-being and environmental preservation, alongside standard GDP data. For example, the Bhutanese government already accounts for the “social wealth” and “natural wealth” of its people, in addition to its GDP figures.
We could also establish a stock exchange, alongside traditional securities markets, comprising so-called ethical organizations, such as social enterprises, cooperative banks, microcredit agencies and fair trade groups. Several initiatives in Brazil, South Africa and the UK, among others, have already taken small steps in this direction.
Small steps lead to big changes. As the value of altruism becomes increasingly obvious, the new approach will spread through the economy, benefiting all of society, future generations and the planet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate / Global Economic Symposium
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with