Harvard University biologist Martin Nowak wrote that cooperation is “the architect of creativity throughout evolution, from cells to multicellular creatures to anthills to villages to cities.” As mankind now tries to solve new, global challenges, we must also find new ways to cooperate and the basis for this cooperation must be altruism.
The desire to help others without consideration for ourselves is not just a noble ideal. Selflessness raises the quality and elevates the meaning of our lives, and that of our descendants — our very survival may even depend on it. We must have the insight to recognize this and the audacity to say so.
Humanity faces three monumental challenges: ensuring that everyone has decent living conditions, improving life satisfaction and protecting our planet.
Traditional cost-benefit analysis struggles to reconcile these demands, because they span different time frames. We worry about the state of the economy from year to year, but we consider our happiness over the course of a lifetime, while our concern for the environment will mainly benefit future generations.
ATTAINABLE GOAL
Yet an altruistic approach requires few trade-offs. A considerate investor will never speculate recklessly with his clients’ life savings, despite the potential gain for himself. A caring citizen will always think first how his actions affect his community. A selfless generation will exercise care with the planet to leave a livable world to its children. Altruism makes us all better off.
This vision of the world may seem idealistic. After all, psychology, economics and evolutionary biology have often claimed that humans share an essentially selfish nature. However, research conducted over the past 30 years indicates that true altruism does exist and can extend beyond kin and community to encompass the welfare of humans generally, as well as that of other species.
Moreover, the altruist does not have to suffer for his good deeds; on the contrary, he often benefits indirectly from them, while the selfish actor often creates misery for himself, as well as others.
Studies have also shown that an individual can learn to be altruistic. Neuroscientists have identified three components of altruism that anyone can develop as acquired skills: empathy (understanding and sharing the feelings of another), loving kindness (the wish to spread happiness) and compassion (a desire to relieve the suffering of another).
Societies can also become more altruistic and may even enjoy an evolutionary advantage over their more selfish counterparts. Research on the evolution of cultures suggests that human values can change more quickly than our genes.
Therefore, if we are to engender a more caring world, we must first recognize the importance of altruism and then cultivate it among individuals and promote cultural change in our societies.
STRIKING A BALANCE
Nowhere is the need to cultivate this recognition clearer than in our economic system. The unrealistic pursuit of endless quantitative growth places intolerable strains on our planet and widens inequalities. However, reversing that growth would create other problems, forcing people to compete for diminishing assets and resources would spread unemployment, poverty and violence.
So a balance must be struck: The global community must lift 1.5 billion people out of poverty, while the excesses of the world’s richest consumers — which cause the vast majority of ecological degradation — must be limited. We do not need to impose more taxes to achieve this, but we can persuade the wealthy that the eternal pursuit of material gain is both unsustainable and unnecessary for their own quality of life.
This concept of “sustainable harmony” can be promoted by publishing indices of personal well-being and environmental preservation, alongside standard GDP data. For example, the Bhutanese government already accounts for the “social wealth” and “natural wealth” of its people, in addition to its GDP figures.
We could also establish a stock exchange, alongside traditional securities markets, comprising so-called ethical organizations, such as social enterprises, cooperative banks, microcredit agencies and fair trade groups. Several initiatives in Brazil, South Africa and the UK, among others, have already taken small steps in this direction.
Small steps lead to big changes. As the value of altruism becomes increasingly obvious, the new approach will spread through the economy, benefiting all of society, future generations and the planet.
Copyright: Project Syndicate / Global Economic Symposium
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations