Generally speaking, Japanese bureaucrats are not much given to exaggeration, so when a senior government insider in Tokyo — speaking off the record — recently compared the deteriorating security situation in East Asia to Europe in the 1930s amid the rise of fascism, it was time to sit up and take notice.
“Tensions are getting very high in this part of the world,” the official said. “The security position is extremely severe. There are huge arms sales from Russia, the US and Europe. China’s defense spending has seen double-digit growth each year since 1989. They are not a responsible partner. US influence in the region is receding.”
Bad blood between Japan and China runs deep and, in the modern era, dates from the 1931 invasion of Manchuria.
Illustration: Yusha
Following its defeat in 1945 and its adoption of a pacifist constitution, Japan became wholly dependent on the US for its defense.
Some analysts claim it has long been in Tokyo’s interests to play up the China “threat,” but, objectively speaking, the threat is real and it becomes tangibly more worrying by the day.
Extraordinarily rapid economic growth in China in recent decades has seen it overtake Japan as the world’s second-largest economy, and the concomitant expansion of Beijing’s political, diplomatic and military might have set alarm bells clanging across the region as never before.
Today, the talk at embassy cocktail parties is not so much about how to “contain” China — the great, lost conceit of hawkish US geostrategists — as how to appease it.
Tellingly, the Japanese official’s warning came days before China unexpectedly declared a new air defense identification zone in the East China Sea covering the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which are claimed by Taiwan, China and Japan, which calls them the Senkakus.
The ensuing row saw Japan, the US and South Korea send fighter aircraft into the zone in open, dangerous defiance of Beijing’s strictures. A subsequent mediation mission by the US Vice President Joe Biden failed to resolve the standoff, in effect leaving a powder keg smoldering and untended.
Nobody is talking openly about a third world war, not yet at least. However, there is a growing awareness that the seeds of a possible future superpower collision are being sown around the islands, rocks and shoals, and in the overpopulated sea lanes and airspace beyond China’s historic borders, to which Beijing lays claim with growing political robustness and ever-improving military capacity.
The lack of a regional security organization, the absence of a hotline between Beijing and Tokyo, and the ever-present menace represented by the nuclear-armed, Chinese-backed regime in North Korea all add to the inherent dangers of the current situation.
Like any empire in the past, as China’s power grows, that power is ineluctably projected to encompass Beijing’s immediate neighbors and — in time — geographical regions and even continents.
For Beijing, the final frontier in this reverse engineering of manifest destiny is the Pacific basin. Yet to achieve dominance, it must first displace the US, the world’s most militarily powerful nation. This contest has years to run, but it is now beginning, hence the whispers of war.
Three men currently hold the key to what may happen this year: One is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), paramount leader of the Chinese Communist Party and People’s Liberation Army, who succeeded former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in March last year. In a sharp change of tone, Xi has dropped Hu’s talk of a magnanimous China’s peaceful rise and substituted a tougher, nationalist-sounding message stressing pride in one’s country at home and asserting China’s rights on the international stage with “indomitable will.”
The ideological underpinning for this approach was set out in Xi’s “China dream” inaugural speech, an obvious attempt to provide an alternative to the “American Dream.” As the People’s Daily commented, his idea is “to construct a more open and charismatic communism that makes people excited to be Chinese.”
At a recent party plenum, Xi successfully pushed through an ambitious reform program, while strengthening his grip on power.
“Xi emerged from the plenum as the most powerful Chinese leader since Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平),” analyst William Pesek said. “Xi may be especially willing to risk a confrontation with Japan right now in order to distract opponents of his proposed reforms, as well as ordinary Chinese who are growing restless over pollution, income inequality and official corruption. Nothing brings China’s 1.3 billion people together so easily as hating the Japanese.”
Xi’s rise to power has coincided with the emergence of a similarly hardheaded individual as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who took office around the same time as Xi and has his own agenda for dealing with China. It sometimes makes Abe’s US allies and the 10 members of ASEAN — China’s smaller neighbors — wince with anxiety.
An unrepentant nationalist, Abe said it is past time for Japan to drop its pacifist laws, recognize the many threats to its security and stand up boldly for its interests and values.
To this end, he has increased defense spending, created a new national security council, strengthened alliances with countries such as the Philippines (which has its own territorial dispute with China) and plans to buy advanced new US weaponry.
“Japan is back,” Abe said during a visit to Washington last year.
For this and other reasons, Xi has refused to meet him, as has South Korean President Park Geun-hye. Official media denounce Abe as a revisionist and militarist. This chilly impasse has worsened the strains over China’s new air zone.
The third key player in this unfolding drama is US President Barack Obama, who has bigger guns and more ships and planes than the other two combined. Like the rest of the world, the US administration can think of 1,000 reasons why a war in East Asia would be disastrously self-defeating for all concerned, starting with the negative impact on international trade, finance and US debt.
Aware of the perception that US regional influence is receding and that the smallest spark could cause a conflagration, Obama has shifted his approach. His so-called “pivot” to Asia, giving the area a higher foreign policy priority, is principally aimed — despite denials — at countering Chinese blue-water navy ambitions in the Pacific and other unsettling manifestations of Chinese power projection.
Regional observers question how serious Obama is about the China “threat” and whether, for example, he would really come to Japan’s defense if the Diaoyutais dispute degenerated into a shooting war. Perhaps this year will provide the answer.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations