Spectacular New Year’s Eve countdown parties and firework shows have become an annual ritual. However, people have started asking whether local governments should continue lavishing tens of millions of New Taiwan dollars on one night, given the years of financial difficulty and so many people still in need.
They also wonder whether it would make more sense to introduce variety to the celebrations, so that the same activities do not occur in every city.
These concerns demonstrate Taiwanese have the generosity, good sense and creativity to identify true needs versus extravagance, in their attempts to usher in the new year in a way that is not superficial.
However, does the government engage in similar self-reflection?
It seems that compared with the public, policymakers and government officials lack creativity about the nation’s development. Not understanding what people are really concerned about poses a real national problem going forward.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said in his New Year’s Day address that revitalizing the nation’s economy is the government’s top priority this year, and that he has invited former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) to organize a special task force to help push Taiwan’s entry into two economic blocs under negotiation — the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).
Sound familiar?
This is practically the same annual resolution Ma has made over the years, and this economic task force is no different to its many predecessors.
Clearly, the government has lost its ability to design innovative policies for the nation’s future.
However, a more serious problem for policymakers is that they have decided to focus solely on the economy, while pushing aside important national policy issues, such as taxation fairness, social justice and sustainable development.
The most glaring absence in Ma’s New Year’s Day speech was acknowledgment of the public outcry over recent food safety and industrial pollution scandals, and several controversial land grab cases.
If this is how Ma handles the public response to his government’s many economic initiatives over his two terms, he will find no policy breakthrough this year either.
If the government wants to keep the economy moving forward, it must listen to and better communicate with the public.
People want to have decent jobs, better wages and a growing economy, but they do not want government policies that only benefit big business and the elite, while the rest of us are left to live with fears of heavier taxation, unsafe food and environmental degradation.
Ma said in his speech that he hoped everyone would work in unity to boost the economy.
The opportunity exists, but the question is: Who is “everyone” in the government’s eyes. Does it mean ordinary people, or business tycoons and industry heavyweights?
The success of this approach also depends on whether the government can treat the public as close partners and take action in a balanced way.
If there has been soul-searching among Taiwanese, the government should also follow suit.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations