New legislation has come into effect exempting all nurses from Article 84-1 of the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法), which states that employers in certain categories can negotiate work hours with their employees. This raises three main points of concern.
First: Will hospitals be able to operate according to the law and simultaneously guarantee the rights of their staff?
Second: Will hospitals have to suspend services if they are understaffed, and thereby infringe on the rights of their patients?
Finally: If nurses, during the provision of patient care, keep rigidly to their stated work hours and do not wait for the next shift to arrive, will this not endanger patients’ safety?
The prevailing trend is toward being more stringent when it comes to human rights guarantees.
If any hospital dares to violate the new regulations, or does not enforce them fully, they are sure to be found out sooner or later.
The less serious offenders will be fined, but in the more serious cases, the running of the hospital will certainly be affected. It goes without saying that I am concerned that hospitals will, in fact, find it difficult to run properly and offer these guarantees to their employees at the same time.
Hospital staffing shortages are not new. The problem is so prevalent not because hospitals are unwilling to employ nurses, but because they cannot find suitably qualified people. It is difficult work: Patients’ families can be disrespectful, they are under constant pressure from assessments and the law is not flexible enough to take into account the special circumstances of their jobs, to name but a few factors.
It is not the case, as certain NGOs say, that hospitals think only of profits, and do nothing to look after their employees.
Many hospitals have dealt with the problem of staff shortages by reducing their number of hospital beds. Whether this move has actually affected patients’ rights is difficult to evaluate, but at the very least, hospitals should also do their best to get patients in and out as quickly as possible, so that others can be admitted.
The closure of night clinics is similar to the reduction of the numbers of hospital beds: It is a necessary evil due to staff shortages. It is not too extreme to say that hospitals are in a precarious position here. As the new rules come into effect, we need to think carefully about how to fill the staff shortages. If we cannot fill these positions, it is a real possibility that services such as night clinics will have to be suspended.
With an effective shift handover system in place, even in the case of the treatment of acute and serious cases, it should not be too difficult to ensure the shift is handed over smoothly and seamlessly.
Of course, it is entirely understandable that many nurses, even when protected by the new stipulations in the Labor Standards Act, will be quite willing to wait until the shift is handed over, simply out of a sense of responsibility. And naturally the hospital should offer some sort of incentive or compensation for them to do so. This kind of thing happens in other fields, why could it not apply in hospitals?
After all, people working in the medical profession are sure to have the professional ethics and natural disposition to work like this: They are unlikely to act merely out of their own convenience, sacrificing the rights of the patient.
Some people might misrepresent this and say that this is just hospitals concocting various precepts to mistreat their staff.
Newspaper headlines talk of leaving behind the sweatshop culture and the contract responsibility system of hospitals, as if the two can be equated. This is an unfair misrepresentation of the situation.
Shih Shou-chuan is vice superintendent of Mackay Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations