The twin suicide attacks in the city of Volgograd are a calculated challenge to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the eve of the Sochi Winter Olympics. They are also a further depressing sign that the Kremlin’s decade-long strategy for pacifying the North Caucasus has failed.
Can the Russian authorities guarantee security at the Games? The answer is no. Sunday and Monday’s bombings — 32 dead and more than 100 injured so far — tell their own grim story.
These latest attacks could have been foreseen. Over the summer, Russia’s chief insurgent leader, Doku Umarov, gave a chilling warning. Umarov had declared an 18-month moratorium on targets in European Russia, which coincided with the rise of mass street protests against Putin’s rule.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In a four-minute video clip released in July last year Umarov announced a new, violent campaign against Russian “unbelievers.”
More specifically, he threatened to blow up Sochi.
Since 2007, Umarov and his followers have been fighting for an Islamic emirate across Russia’s North Caucasus. For the jihadists, Sochi is a place of mournful ghosts: The Black Sea region was once home to the Muslim Circassians, who were driven out, murdered and deported to Turkey by the Russian army in 1864.
Some of the victims are buried in graves near the site of the key Olympic mountain-sports complex in Krasnaya Polyana.
In his video address, shot in a forest, Umarov accused Moscow of holding the Games “on the bones of many, many Muslims killed.”
The event was “satanic,” he added.
Some analysts had doubted that Umarov’s band of jihadist rebels had the capacity or numbers to carry out high-profile attacks. The two Volgograd bombings — one at the railway station, the other on a crowded commuter trolleybus — show the insurgents are indeed capable of striking outside their usual theater of operations.
Russian media reported that the bomber who blew up himself and the bus on Monday morning was an ethnic Russian and 32-year-old convert to Islam called Pavel Pechenkin. This is the Kremlin’s worst nightmare: Slavic jihadists wreaking havoc.
According to Andrei Soldatov, an expert on Russia’s security services, the bombings were designed to divert attention and police resources away from Sochi.
The blasts could be a diversion before a further possible attack on the Olympics itself or Moscow, he said.
Either way, the attacks have created a mood of panic. In the capital, the fearful atmosphere is reminiscent of March 2010, after two female suicide bombers blew themselves up on the Moscow metro, killing 40 people.
Cerwyn Moore, a senior lecturer at the university of Birmingham, who writes on terrorism and insurgency in the North Caucasus, said: “This certainly appears to be the work of Umarov’s Caucasian Emirate. It’s an interesting shift in tactics, moving toward soft targets outside the secure zone within the Olympic park itself.”
This looked like the beginning of a sustained terror campaign, he said.
The authorities have taken extraordinary measures to safeguard the Sochi Games. Over the past four or five months, security forces have conducted numerous sweeps of mountain areas used by the rebels in Dagestan and other simmering republics.
Last month, Ramzan Kadyrov, Chechnya’s thuggish pro-Moscow leader, announced that Umarov was dead. The Russian military has even flown drones over suspected rebel hideouts.
Meanwhile, the resort of Sochi is under military lockdown, with all visitors checked, transport restricted, roadblocks in place, security sweeps carried out and political protests banned. The Russian Federal Security Service — the main KGB successor agency —- is conducting mass electronic surveillance. It will gather metadata from all Olympic participants, including spectators, judges and athletes.
However, will all this be enough? The Sochi Olympic zone may be impregnable. However, if previous jihadist tactics are a guide, the rebels will seek out other soft targets. More broadly, the attacks demonstrate the ineffectiveness of the Kremlin’s counterterrorism strategy.
Over the past two decades, the insurgency in the North Caucasus has changed from a largely secular and nationalist uprising centered on Chechnya to an explicitly Islamist struggle encompassing all of Russia’s southern Muslim republics.
This war is characterized by daily gun battles between rebels and Russian security forces, local and federal. Mostly, it is confined to the North Caucasus itself. However, as Volgograd, shows, no part of Russia is entirely safe.
Brutal counter-insurgency operations have alienated local populations and fueled militancy among the disaffected young. Poverty, joblessness and corruption are further elements in a combustible mix.
Writing on Monday, the novelist and opposition figurehead Boris Akunin said the authorities needed to think about “horizontal” as well as “vertical” solutions to the deep-rooted problems of the North Caucasus.
He called for dialogue and the “consolidation of society.”
With just six weeks to go until the opening Olympic ceremony, time for fresh thinking is rapidly running out.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs