Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) spoke of the legitimacy of his rule, omitting the possibility of a world with two governments of China — his and that of the Chinese Communist Party — by announcing that “gentlemen and thieves cannot coexist,” and he participated in the international community to push out the communists’ “bogus regime.”
The homegrown governments of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) wanted to extricate themselves from this idea and so emphasized Taiwan’s status as a sovereign nation, trying to wrest back the powers it was due.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) speaks of participation in the international community, but bases this approach on the idea that Taiwan is “a part of China.”
The reason Lee and Chen wanted to attend APEC leaders’ meetings was to secure the right to participate in the organization equally with leaders from other countries. The purpose was not so that they could meet the US or Chinese presidents.
The reason that Ma wants to attend one of these international meetings is that he wants the chance to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
There is no other national leader in the world who would so shamelessly fawn on the leader of another nation, just so they would be granted an audience with them. It makes Ma look like a commoner seeking an audience with the ruler in the big city.
Ma’s lack of dignity is dragging Taiwan down, degrading its image, and has set the nation’s moral compass spinning.
The corrupt system of crony capitalism that we have in this country, obfuscated by Chinese politics, has drawn in Taiwanese politicians preoccupied with self-promotion and personal profit, businesspeople pursuing huge profits through bribes and special privilege and an old-guard Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) media apparatus that does not understand the value of freedom.
While senior Chinese officials try to mitigate risk, sending huge sums of money overseas, Taiwanese capital is blindly invested in China. While Chinese are desperate for political and economic reform, Taiwanese — who see China as the answer to everything — are happy for their country to sink with China.
The “people of vision” within the opposition talk not of the national interest, but pander instead to China’s demands, so that they can improve their party’s image.
During the Martial Law era, when the press was subject to severe restrictions, those who wanted a free press felt nothing but abhorrence for the government’s interference in the media and the way it ordered news outlets to report only the official line. These shackles were removed with the arrival of democracy in Taiwan.
However, with Ma’s spineless China policy, the heads of formerly resolute anti-communist media organizations, such as the Central News Agency and state television, have been summoned to Beijing to listen to propaganda from officials intent on securing China’s annexation of Taiwan. They have been instructed to push the line that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are part of one family, to realize the “great renaissance of the Chinese nation.”
Ma is allowing a hostile, totalitarian nation in through the back door, to influence the Taiwanese public through their bellies and their brains and to help the Chinese communists annex Taiwan.
No wonder Chen Chung-hsiao (陳忠孝), the uncle of former Taiwan High Prosecutors’ Office head prosecutor Chen Shou-huang (陳守煌), accused Ma of treason.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations