It seems Taiwanese are conflicted when it comes to conflict. Everyone knows the importance of having a viable national defense mechanism in place, but hardly anyone is willing to serve in the armed forces. According to the latest Control Yuan report, there is real concern that, by 2019, there will be an insufficient number of recruits to sustain the armed forces if the proposed change from mandatory conscription to an all-volunteer recruitment scheme goes forward.
The report adds that the volunteer recruitment system will cost NT$50 billion to NT$60 billion (US$1.67 billion to US$2 billion) more per year to run than the conscription system. This money will have to come from somewhere — likely from education or social welfare budgets, or another sector of state spending.
Naturally, the government’s promotion of the all-volunteer scheme is motivated by electoral considerations. Despite the difficulties encountered in implementing the new system, the government dare not call time on the idea, and similar motivations have led to its reluctance to reinstate the all-conscription system.
The Ministry of National Defense is following the president and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) lead, and has completely disregarded the looming crisis of a military personnel shortage and the advice of experts. Countries that have all-volunteer armed forces generally seek to increase recruitment levels with more generous salary packages. However, will young people tempted into joining the armed forces by cash and material rewards be the type to become outstanding soldiers who serve their country as a vocation? There are many factors to consider when determining the quality or effectiveness of military personnel. Evaluating the armed forces by looking at which recruitment system is used — conscription or volunteer recruitment — leaves too much out of the equation.
The all-volunteer scheme has some major problems, and the armed forces face some serious challenges. These include the need to maintain a standing army that is ready to go into battle when called upon, and the inherent conflict between the all-volunteer recruitment system and the traditional culture of the military machine. The emphasis on conditions, including salary levels, perks and personal rights, are certain to influence the strict discipline and training regimes, even the military’s core values.
The government is trying to attract the younger generation to sign up by promising higher salaries, more perks, better dorms, the choice to spend nights off barracks and a relaxing of bans on smartphones. Are these recruitment marketing ploys really the best way to create a hardened, brave fighting force that is ready for battle and to hell with the risks?
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is made up primarily of conscripts, with volunteer recruits representing a small proportion of PLA personnel. Military service is compulsory for males aged from 18 to 22, and in any given year, there are 10 million men eligible, of which the top 10 percent are selected to do military service. The selection criteria include levels of physical strength and health, toughness and education. Taiwan, faced with the PLA as a threat, is gradually reducing the length of military service, and will soon be giving recruits better perks, longer vacations and better treatment. If the nation’s armed forces ever come up against the PLA, the outcome would be predictable before a single shot is fired.
Israel has a draft system. Everyone, male or female, needs to serve on reaching 18 years of age. Men have to serve three years, women for between 18 months and two years. In Switzerland, military service is mandatory for every male over the age of 20. They are required to do between 18 and 21 weeks of military training, and military obligations end at the age of 34 or 50, depending on rank. Even after the end of their military service, those of soldier rank still have to do three weeks of military training every other year, and must keep weapons in their homes, so that they will be ready and available for duty should there be a war. The point is not how personnel are enlisted, but rigorous military training and the public’s sense of loyalty.
Military personnel in a volunteer recruitment system regard service as an occupation, for the purpose of personal reward and promotion. Military strategists Richard Gabriel and Edward Luttwak have cautioned that excessive professionalization of armed forces is detrimental to military spirit. Political scientist Samuel Huntington said that joining the armed forces was unique in that it was a higher calling in the service of society. He saw it as not merely an occupation, but as a vocation, the selfless service to contribute to the country that far surpassed the pursuit of material gain or remuneration.
The British Army recruits people from the age of 16, who, once enlisted, must normally serve for at least four years. In the past, military service in the Republic of China Army lasted for two years, or for three years in the navy or air force. Over time this has been whittled down to not even a single year after years of interference by politicians preoccupied with votes.
Politicians are rashly trying to implement an all-volunteer recruitment system, with the traits and temptations of a professional occupation, not a vocation. Will the military, in this guise, reach the standards advocated by Huntington?
Johnny Shieh is an assistant professor in Kao Yuan University’s marketing and distribution management department.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs