You may not have noticed it, but over the past year Google has bought eight robotics companies. Its most recent acquisition is an outfit called Boston Dynamics, which makes the nearest thing to a mechanical mule that you are ever likely to see. It is called Big Dog and it walks, runs, climbs and carries heavy loads. It is the size of a large dog or small mule — about 1m long, 76.2cm tall, weighs 109kg, has four legs that are articulated like an animal’s, runs at 6.5kph, climbs slopes up to 35 degrees, walks across rubble, climbs muddy hiking trails, walks in snow and water, carries a 154kg load, can toss breeze blocks and can recover its balance when walking on ice after absorbing a hefty sideways kick.
You do not believe me? Well, just head over to YouTube and search for “Boston Dynamics.” There, you will find not only a fascinating video of Big Dog in action, but also confirmation that its maker has a menagerie of mechanical beasts, some of them humanoid in form, others resembling predatory animals. You will not be surprised to learn that most have been developed on military contracts, including some issued by the US’ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the outfit that originally funded the development of the Internet.
Should we be concerned about this? Yes, but not in the way you might first think. The notion that Google is assembling a droid army that will one day give it a Star Wars capability seems implausible (even if we make allowances for the fact that its mobile software is called android). No; what makes the robotics acquisitions interesting is what they reveal about the scale of Google’s ambitions. For this is a company whose like we have not seen before.
VISIONARIES
Google is run by two youngish men, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, who are, in a literal sense, visionaries. Google’s shareholding structure gives them untrammeled power: While other companies have to fret about the opinion of Wall Street, quarterly results and so on, the Google boys can do as they please.
Where most public companies — and all governments — nowadays have little desire for risk, they appear to have an insatiable appetite for it. One reason for this is that Google’s dominance of search and online advertising provides a continuous flow of unimaginable revenues. The company exercises a gravitational pull on the most talented intellects in their field — software. Since software is pure thought-stuff, collective IQ is all that matters in this business. Google has it in spades.
What drives the Google founders is an acute understanding of the possibilities that long-term developments in information technology have deposited in mankind’s lap. Computing power has been doubling every 18 months since 1956. Bandwidth has been tripling and electronic storage capacity has been quadrupling every year. Put those trends together and the only reasonable inference is that our assumptions about what networked machines can and cannot do need urgently to be updated.
However, most of us have failed to do that and have, instead, clung wistfully to old certainties about the unique capabilities (and therefore superiority) of humans. Thus we assumed that the task of safely driving a car in crowded urban conditions would be, for the foreseeable future, a task that only we could do. Similarly, we imagined that realtime translation between two languages would remain the exclusive preserve of humans. And so on.
POSSIBILITIES
What makes the Google boys so distinctive is not that they did update their assumptions about what machines can and cannot do (because many people in the field were aware of what was becoming possible), but that they possessed the limitless resources needed to explore and harness those new possibilities. Hence the self-driving car, the massive open online courses, the Google books project, the free gigabit connectivity project, the X labs and so on.
These are just for starters. A few months ago, an astute technology commentator, Jason Calcanis, set out what he saw as Google’s to-do list. Here is what he came up with: free gigabit Internet access for everyone for life; mastering Big Data, machine learning and quantum computing; dominating wearable — and implantable — computing; becoming a huge venture capitalist and developing new kinds of currency (a la Bitcoin); becoming the world’s biggest media company; revolutionizing healthcare and technologies for life extension; alternative energy technologies; and transforming transportation.
If any other company had a to-do list such as this we would have its executives sectioned under a Mental Health Act. And it is possible, I suppose, that the Google founders are indeed nuts. However, I would not bet on it, which is why we ought to be concerned. Because if even a fraction of the company’s ambitions eventually come to fruition, Google will become one of the most powerful corporations on Earth.
And we know what Lord Acton would have said about that.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry