China is basking in the success of its moon landing. The achievement deserves respect, given that only the US and Russia have been able to attain the lofty goal since 1959. However, putting China’s accomplishment in the same league as those of its forerunners would be misplaced praise. Credit should be given where it is due and the record should be set straight.
Solid-state transistors were invented in 1948 and small-scale integrated circuits followed in 1952. The inventions, and countless others of those times — conceived in Bell Labs and the Fairchild Semiconductors Laboratory and their numerous spin-offs — set in motion the microelectronics revolution, which has lasted till today.
Even with such advantage, one should recognize that it was an extremely risky proposition when then-US president John F. Kennedy challenged the nation to send men to the moon before 1970, considering that in 1961 the IBM 1620 mainframe computer had less computing power than a desktop PC of the 1980s.
A rigid-body vehicle in a high-speed space flight requires precise trajectory management and altitude control. Many special sensors, signal processors and actuators are required to accomplish these two tasks.
For landing on the moon, two operations, among many, are deemed the most critical: lunar transfer orbit insertion and descent to the lunar surface.
The insertion operation moves a satellite from a linear trajectory onto an orbit around the moon. It requires a precise control of altitude, thruster ignition timing and burn duration. Once in a circular orbit and stabilized, the landing vehicle must be reoriented with further thruster burns so that the landing gear is facing toward the target surface. Once committed to the descent phase all sensors must work almost in perfect unison to enable a controlled deceleration and a soft landing.
In the 1960s, the sensors required for such missions were not readily available even to the US space agency. What was available were primitive designs requiring improvements and resources. On many occasions, new designs were started from scratch as they were needed.
In essence, US unmanned lunar missions in the 1960s, manned Apollo projects in the 1970s, and space shuttles and the Hubble Space Telescope in the 1980s can all be claimed as homemade. They were completely original without either existing support or any intellectual thievery.
Now fast forward to China’s Chang’e project, which began in the early 2000s. By this time, high-performance sensors providing measurements in digital format were easily procured on the commercial market.
High-speed microcomputers running at several gigahertz and fitting in a box the size of a notebook could be bought for less than a few thousand US dollars in public stores. Many other sophisticated components of all sort could be acquired online.
In all, China’s success in space is built on backbreaking work and sweat that it did not contribute to at all.
This is not to diminish the impressive strides China has made in many respect since its reforms that started in the late 1970s. Depending on how it is presented, the event’s significance may have many faces.
Gloating over the lunar landing aside, China is still facing an unpleasant question: How many moon trips will it take to erase the image of hundreds of Chinese babies sickened by milk laced with toxin?
Following the completion of the Apollo program, NASA did not revisit the moon for almost 40 years. Bringing back a few moon rocks, later misplaced, simply cannot justify the huge investment. For a while, the Chinese rover Yutu roaming the moon’s surface will whip up nationalistic excitement, but the question posed by the milk scandal remains unanswered.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the US-based Taiwan Public Policy Council.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under