With economic growth now picking up and unemployment inching its way down, things are beginning to look up for Britain’s economy. Except that it does not seem that way to most people.
British Prime Minister David Cameron may be in denial, but most people in Britain are experiencing a “cost of living crisis,” as the Labour Party put it. Growth in nominal wages has failed to keep up with the rise in prices. With real wages predicted by the UK Office for Budget Responsibility not to recover to the pre-crisis level until 2018, we are literally in for a “lost decade” for wage earners in Britain.
Worse, the crisis for British wage earners is much more than the cost of living. It is a work crisis too. For most people, unemployment results in a loss of dignity, from the feeling of no longer being a useful member of society. When combined with economic hardship, this loss makes the jobless more likely to suffer depression and even to take their own lives, as starkly shown by Sanjay Basu and David Stuckler in their book, The Body Economic. There is even some evidence, published in the British Medical Journal, that out-of-work people become more prone to heart disease. Unemployment literally costs human lives.
POOR WELL-BEING
British workers have been doing badly on this account since the financial crisis began. Although the unemployment rate has fallen, it still stands at 7.4 percent. Most people find this rate acceptable, if regrettable -- but that is only because they have been taught to believe that full employment is impossible. We may not be able to go back to the mid-1960s and the mid-70s, when the jobless rate was between 1 percent and 2 percent, but a rate much lower than today’s is possible, if we had different economic policies.
There is also the issue of job security. The feeling of insecurity is inimical to our sense of well-being, as it causes anxiety and stress, which harm our physical and mental health. It is no surprise then that, according to some surveys, workers across the world value job security more highly than wages.
British workers have been doing very poorly on this account too. The rise in the number of zero-hours contracts is only the most extreme manifestation of increasing insecurity for the workforce. The 2010 European Social Survey revealed that a third of British workers feared losing their jobs -- giving Britain, together with Ireland, the highest sense of job insecurity in Europe.
Then there is the issue of the quality of work. Even if you are getting the same real wage — which most British workers are not — well-being is reduced if your work becomes less palatable. It may have become more strenuous because, say, the company has just turned up the speed of the conveyor belt in the factory, as happened to Charlie Chaplin in the film Modern Times. Or the stress level may have increased because the company reduced your control over your work, as Amazon did when it decided to attach GPS machines to its warehouse staff.
Whatever form it takes, any deterioration in the quality of work can harm the worker’s well-being, and this is what has been happening to many employees in Britain.
HIGH JOBLESS RATE
The European Social Survey also revealed that a quarter of British workers have had to do less interesting work. The Skills and Employment Survey last year revealed that British employees are now working with much greater intensity than before the crisis. The proportions of jobs requiring high pressure, high speed and hard work all rose significantly from 2006.
Then there is the issue of commuting. Britons spend more hours traveling to and from work than any other workforce in Europe and to make things worse, the quality of the commute has been deteriorating. The failure to invest in transportation has meant more crowded and more frequently disrupted journeys in many regions of the country. Recent surveys have also revealed that more and more people are working while they commute, at least in part to cope with increased workloads.
Add all of these up, and the picture is grim. Not only are British workers earning less, but the quality of their working life is deteriorating. Too many people are still unemployed. Job security is being eroded. Work is becoming more difficult, strenuous and uninteresting. Work outside official working hours is becoming more widespread. Commuting is more stressful. Once we take into account all these dimensions, it becomes evident that the “cost of living crisis” is only one — albeit important — part of a broader problem that is afflicting most people in Britain.
Despite the graveness of the situation, this wider crisis — perhaps we can call it the “general living crisis” — is not seriously discussed because over the last few decades we have come to neglect work as a serious issue.
WORK PURPOSE
During this period, most Britons have come to see themselves mainly — or even solely -- as consumers, rather than workers. The dominant free-market ideology has convinced them that consumption is the ultimate goal of life, and that their work is only a means to gaining the income to buy the goods and services from which to derive pleasure. At the same time, the decline of the trade union movement has made many people believe that being a “worker” is something of an anachronism. As a result, policies are narrowly focused on generating higher income, while any suggestion that we spend money on making jobs more secure and work less stressful is dismissed as naive. Yet this neglect of work-related life is absurd when most adults of working age devote more than half their waking hours to their jobs — especially if we include the time spent on commuting and increasingly, out-of-hours work. We simply cannot ignore this when judging how well we are doing.
If we are to deal with the “general living crisis,” we need to radically change our perspectives on what is a good life. We need to accept that consumption is not the end goal of our life and stop measuring our well-being simply on the basis of earnings. We need to explicitly take the quality of our work-related life into account in judging our well-being.
Let us start taking work seriously.
Chang Ha-joon, author of 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism, teaches economics at Cambridge University.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under