With economic growth now picking up and unemployment inching its way down, things are beginning to look up for Britain’s economy. Except that it does not seem that way to most people.
British Prime Minister David Cameron may be in denial, but most people in Britain are experiencing a “cost of living crisis,” as the Labour Party put it. Growth in nominal wages has failed to keep up with the rise in prices. With real wages predicted by the UK Office for Budget Responsibility not to recover to the pre-crisis level until 2018, we are literally in for a “lost decade” for wage earners in Britain.
Worse, the crisis for British wage earners is much more than the cost of living. It is a work crisis too. For most people, unemployment results in a loss of dignity, from the feeling of no longer being a useful member of society. When combined with economic hardship, this loss makes the jobless more likely to suffer depression and even to take their own lives, as starkly shown by Sanjay Basu and David Stuckler in their book, The Body Economic. There is even some evidence, published in the British Medical Journal, that out-of-work people become more prone to heart disease. Unemployment literally costs human lives.
POOR WELL-BEING
British workers have been doing badly on this account since the financial crisis began. Although the unemployment rate has fallen, it still stands at 7.4 percent. Most people find this rate acceptable, if regrettable -- but that is only because they have been taught to believe that full employment is impossible. We may not be able to go back to the mid-1960s and the mid-70s, when the jobless rate was between 1 percent and 2 percent, but a rate much lower than today’s is possible, if we had different economic policies.
There is also the issue of job security. The feeling of insecurity is inimical to our sense of well-being, as it causes anxiety and stress, which harm our physical and mental health. It is no surprise then that, according to some surveys, workers across the world value job security more highly than wages.
British workers have been doing very poorly on this account too. The rise in the number of zero-hours contracts is only the most extreme manifestation of increasing insecurity for the workforce. The 2010 European Social Survey revealed that a third of British workers feared losing their jobs -- giving Britain, together with Ireland, the highest sense of job insecurity in Europe.
Then there is the issue of the quality of work. Even if you are getting the same real wage — which most British workers are not — well-being is reduced if your work becomes less palatable. It may have become more strenuous because, say, the company has just turned up the speed of the conveyor belt in the factory, as happened to Charlie Chaplin in the film Modern Times. Or the stress level may have increased because the company reduced your control over your work, as Amazon did when it decided to attach GPS machines to its warehouse staff.
Whatever form it takes, any deterioration in the quality of work can harm the worker’s well-being, and this is what has been happening to many employees in Britain.
HIGH JOBLESS RATE
The European Social Survey also revealed that a quarter of British workers have had to do less interesting work. The Skills and Employment Survey last year revealed that British employees are now working with much greater intensity than before the crisis. The proportions of jobs requiring high pressure, high speed and hard work all rose significantly from 2006.
Then there is the issue of commuting. Britons spend more hours traveling to and from work than any other workforce in Europe and to make things worse, the quality of the commute has been deteriorating. The failure to invest in transportation has meant more crowded and more frequently disrupted journeys in many regions of the country. Recent surveys have also revealed that more and more people are working while they commute, at least in part to cope with increased workloads.
Add all of these up, and the picture is grim. Not only are British workers earning less, but the quality of their working life is deteriorating. Too many people are still unemployed. Job security is being eroded. Work is becoming more difficult, strenuous and uninteresting. Work outside official working hours is becoming more widespread. Commuting is more stressful. Once we take into account all these dimensions, it becomes evident that the “cost of living crisis” is only one — albeit important — part of a broader problem that is afflicting most people in Britain.
Despite the graveness of the situation, this wider crisis — perhaps we can call it the “general living crisis” — is not seriously discussed because over the last few decades we have come to neglect work as a serious issue.
WORK PURPOSE
During this period, most Britons have come to see themselves mainly — or even solely -- as consumers, rather than workers. The dominant free-market ideology has convinced them that consumption is the ultimate goal of life, and that their work is only a means to gaining the income to buy the goods and services from which to derive pleasure. At the same time, the decline of the trade union movement has made many people believe that being a “worker” is something of an anachronism. As a result, policies are narrowly focused on generating higher income, while any suggestion that we spend money on making jobs more secure and work less stressful is dismissed as naive. Yet this neglect of work-related life is absurd when most adults of working age devote more than half their waking hours to their jobs — especially if we include the time spent on commuting and increasingly, out-of-hours work. We simply cannot ignore this when judging how well we are doing.
If we are to deal with the “general living crisis,” we need to radically change our perspectives on what is a good life. We need to accept that consumption is not the end goal of our life and stop measuring our well-being simply on the basis of earnings. We need to explicitly take the quality of our work-related life into account in judging our well-being.
Let us start taking work seriously.
Chang Ha-joon, author of 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism, teaches economics at Cambridge University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with