Tue, Dec 24, 2013 - Page 9 News List

Drugs boycott lowers rate of US executions

A new Death Penalty Information Center report says there were 39 executions this year — the lowest number since 1994

By Ed Pilkington  /  The Guardian, New York

Illustration: Yusha

The European-led boycott of medical drugs used by US corrections departments to execute prisoners is having such an impact that it has driven the number of executions to an almost all-time low, a leading authority on the death penalty said.

The year-end report for this year from the Death Penalty Information Center, based in Washington, records that there were 39 executions this year — only the second time since 1994 that the number has fallen below 40. The report said a major factor behind the slump in judicial killings has been the difficulty states that still practice the death penalty are encountering in finding a consistent means of ending life.

California, Arkansas and North Carolina have all had effective moratoriums for the past seven years because they have failed to settle on a workable lethal injection protocol. Several other states are turning to untested drugs or lethal medicines improvised in single batches by so-called “compounding pharmacies” that are not subject to federal regulations.

“The goal posts keep shifting under the death penalty states,” Death Penalty Information Center director and report lead author Richard Dieter said. “As soon as they move to a new protocol, the boycott spreads.”

The European Commission imposed tough restrictions on the export of anesthetics to US corrections departments in 2011, and amid the squeeze a succession of states has been running out of their primary lethal drugs supplies.

As a result, Florida has turned to midazolam hydrochloride, a drug never before used in executions, provoking an outcry that it might be inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on condemned prisoners.

This year’s Death Penalty Information Center report is the latest in a series of annual surveys produced by the center since 1995. Dieter said that over the course of the 18 years he has been compiling the summaries he has seen the practice peak and then steadily decline.

“When we started, the patterns were towards an increase in the death penalty. But since about 2000 the trend has been down — whether you measure that in actual executions, new death sentences, the size of death row or the total number of death penalty states. Perhaps this is the final chapter, though that is too early to tell,” he said.

This year’s report follows a downward path. Although the number of new death sentences crept up slightly from last year to 80, that remains close to the lowest level since executions were halted by the US Supreme Court in 1973 and far fewer than the peak of 315 in 1996.

The death row population in the US has similarly declined, with 3,108 inmates awaiting execution on April 1 this year compared with 3,170 a year previously.

In May, Maryland became the sixth state in six years to repeal the death penalty. It is the 18th state in total.

While the national picture is pointing towards the withering away of the death sentence in the US, locally the pattern is toward ever greater extremes. As it recedes, the practice is becoming focused increasingly in a minority of states — with just nine carrying out an execution this year and 82 percent of the executions taking place in the South.

Two states stand out above all others. Texas retains its undisputed position as the death penalty capital of the US, taking the lives of 16 of its prisoners this year — almost half the total from across the US. However, even in Texas the winds of change can be felt. Texan courts gave out only nine new death sentences in the course of the year — down from its 1999 peak of 48.

This story has been viewed 1147 times.
TOP top