The European-led boycott of medical drugs used by US corrections departments to execute prisoners is having such an impact that it has driven the number of executions to an almost all-time low, a leading authority on the death penalty said.
The year-end report for this year from the Death Penalty Information Center, based in Washington, records that there were 39 executions this year — only the second time since 1994 that the number has fallen below 40. The report said a major factor behind the slump in judicial killings has been the difficulty states that still practice the death penalty are encountering in finding a consistent means of ending life.
California, Arkansas and North Carolina have all had effective moratoriums for the past seven years because they have failed to settle on a workable lethal injection protocol. Several other states are turning to untested drugs or lethal medicines improvised in single batches by so-called “compounding pharmacies” that are not subject to federal regulations.
“The goal posts keep shifting under the death penalty states,” Death Penalty Information Center director and report lead author Richard Dieter said. “As soon as they move to a new protocol, the boycott spreads.”
The European Commission imposed tough restrictions on the export of anesthetics to US corrections departments in 2011, and amid the squeeze a succession of states has been running out of their primary lethal drugs supplies.
As a result, Florida has turned to midazolam hydrochloride, a drug never before used in executions, provoking an outcry that it might be inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on condemned prisoners.
This year’s Death Penalty Information Center report is the latest in a series of annual surveys produced by the center since 1995. Dieter said that over the course of the 18 years he has been compiling the summaries he has seen the practice peak and then steadily decline.
“When we started, the patterns were towards an increase in the death penalty. But since about 2000 the trend has been down — whether you measure that in actual executions, new death sentences, the size of death row or the total number of death penalty states. Perhaps this is the final chapter, though that is too early to tell,” he said.
This year’s report follows a downward path. Although the number of new death sentences crept up slightly from last year to 80, that remains close to the lowest level since executions were halted by the US Supreme Court in 1973 and far fewer than the peak of 315 in 1996.
The death row population in the US has similarly declined, with 3,108 inmates awaiting execution on April 1 this year compared with 3,170 a year previously.
In May, Maryland became the sixth state in six years to repeal the death penalty. It is the 18th state in total.
While the national picture is pointing towards the withering away of the death sentence in the US, locally the pattern is toward ever greater extremes. As it recedes, the practice is becoming focused increasingly in a minority of states — with just nine carrying out an execution this year and 82 percent of the executions taking place in the South.
Two states stand out above all others. Texas retains its undisputed position as the death penalty capital of the US, taking the lives of 16 of its prisoners this year — almost half the total from across the US. However, even in Texas the winds of change can be felt. Texan courts gave out only nine new death sentences in the course of the year — down from its 1999 peak of 48.
The other state that stands out is Florida, which is pursuing the death penalty with an enthusiasm shown by few other parts of the country.
It came in second in the list of executions, having killed seven of its inmates this year. It has also declared its intention to execute more people more quickly, with the passage of the Timely Justice Act that speeds up the execution process.
Public opinion also continues to shift as the extreme costs of executions, as well as concern about innocent lives being taken, wears away at popular approval.
In Gallup’s annual poll, support for the death penalty fell to 60 percent — the lowest level for more than 40 years.
Prominent Americans added their voices to the call for abolition this year. Mary Kate Cary, former speechwriter for former US president George H.W. Bush wrote that:
“Times have changed, and it’s time for conservatives to get on the right side of the death penalty argument. One can oppose the death penalty and still be in favor of a tough, affordable, accurate and fair criminal justice system.”
In November, former US president Jimmy Carter told the Guardian that he wanted to see a new nationwide moratorium on the death penalty, on grounds that it was applied so unfairly.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations